Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nicollo

-- Yes, the 17th came after the 16th. My point is that the 16th would have allowed the Federal Gov't to tax income, probably closer to its intended level(s).

-- AntiBurr is right on the Christmas Eve vote, and Wilson later stated that the Fed was the greatest regret of his presidency.


76 posted on 05/30/2005 7:33:26 PM PDT by Remember_Salamis (A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: Remember_Salamis

Any attempt to de-legitimize the 16th & 17th amendments, and the Fed. Reserve Act by wishing away their legitimacy through supposed illegitimate methods is useless and serves any arguments against them, good or bad, poorly.

DiLorenzo is so blinded by antipathy for Lincoln he can't see anything but what he hates in things Lincoln had nothing to do with. You folks get equally blinded in arguing out whether or not the Fed Reserve, etc., is real or not. Who gives a sh*t what Wilson thought of it. Wilson was an ass. He signed the damned thing. That's like having Dubya complain about CFR.


85 posted on 05/30/2005 7:40:37 PM PDT by nicollo (All economics are politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson