Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/30/2005 10:43:39 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
To: nickcarraway
Trent Lott is one lousy SOB, needs to get his power and doesn't care what happens to the country in the process.

Someone should grab that boy by the stacking swivel and explain the facts of life.

2 posted on 05/30/2005 10:47:51 PM PDT by dts32041 (Robin Hood, stealing from the government and giving back to tax payer. Where is he today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Aw geeze... That's just great!!! Now we've got two sour grapes Senators pullin crappola just to "get even" like a buncha Dems filled with "getevenwithemism!"

This is getting downright juvenile!!!

3 posted on 05/30/2005 10:47:58 PM PDT by SierraWasp (The "Heritage Oaks" in the Sierra-Nevada Conservancy are full of parasitic GovernMental mistletoe!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Lott is a lily-livered puke. At least McCain beats his breast and boasts about sticking his dagger into us. This guy sneaks around in the dark, manipulating others to do his dirty work. He should never be near the leadership, and even better shown the door by the good people of Mississippi.


4 posted on 05/30/2005 10:48:36 PM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Well .. GWB had a bad week too back in the 2000 primaries. However, he recovered and went on to be President. Hmmmmm?? do I see a pattern there ..??


5 posted on 05/30/2005 10:51:19 PM PDT by CyberAnt (President Bush: "America is the greatest nation on the face of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Yes, that's what the Republic needs back in power: Sir Fag-a-Lott


6 posted on 05/30/2005 10:51:22 PM PDT by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
How in hell can so many worthless, ego crazed pissants become SENATORS for crying out loud!!!

We need TERM LIMITS... Two terms and OUT...

The longer the sonsuvbitches are in Washington, the crazier and more dangerous to the Republic they become..

Semper Fi
7 posted on 05/30/2005 10:54:29 PM PDT by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
"He isn't trying to help the President," says the leadership aide. "He's working the caucus in a way that would damage Bolton's chances for confirmation. Every conservative should be worried about this."

I listened to him practically swear to Sean Hannity that he wasn't pulling any fast ones, but I heard some pretty heavy potential for parsing in his words, as well!!!

8 posted on 05/30/2005 10:54:32 PM PDT by SierraWasp (The "Heritage Oaks" in the Sierra-Nevada Conservancy are full of parasitic GovernMental mistletoe!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
When Lott's participation in these negotiations was reported about 10 days ago, his office was flooded with calls and faxes. Lott denied any involvement in the negotiations -- he lied to several news outlets. This guy is not only incompetent (see Senate power sharing agreement), but he is a liar. I can't believe he could secure 10 votes for majority leader with most of those coming from the senate barbershop quartet and the northeast RINO's who don't want a strong repub leader.
14 posted on 05/30/2005 11:19:01 PM PDT by double_down
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Reminds me of that song Rush used to play, sung to the tune of Should I Stay or Should I Go from the movie This is Spinal Tap:

My name is Maverick John McCain
My only straight talk is my name
With the libs I often vote
Just to get old Trent Lott's goat ...

Looks like that song needs some updating.

16 posted on 05/30/2005 11:35:01 PM PDT by TheMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
I wonder if Lott was the Senator that Limbaugh said he was through with last week. Many people thought it was McCain, but McCain was just being McCain. This sounds like Lott is willing to sacrifice the whole Republican agenda just to get his power back.

-PJ

17 posted on 05/30/2005 11:45:18 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
I wonder if Haley Barbour can be convinced to publicly take on Lott with criticism. It might not go over well if the White House comments (separation of powers and all), but if the Governor of Lott's state has an opinion on Lott's behavior, that might get some notice. After all, Senators are supposed to represent their states.

-PJ

19 posted on 05/30/2005 11:55:40 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Lott's brain synapses have a disconnect somewhere along the way to his mouth.

Another example of his backstabbing was the Senate "no trial" for impeachment of X42. What a turd.

20 posted on 05/31/2005 12:00:35 AM PDT by Skybird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Frist's lousy week has little to do with his leadership abilities, which should not be in doubt given his track record of forcing the issues with Democrats.

What happy horsesh*t! The Democrats have been crapping on the heads of Republican "leadership" for years now.

I don't know how much I believe of the machinations of Trent Lott. If he was doing half this crap, Frist would merely have to blow his cover and put the mark of Cain on Lott's forehead. Lott would be dead with Republicans everywhere.

21 posted on 05/31/2005 12:02:55 AM PDT by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Here's another example of Lott's deal-making ability: Daschle-Lott Secret Deal Delays Bush's Agenda Until 2003.

Daschle-Lott Secret Deal Delays Bush's Agenda Until 2003
Wes Vernon, NewsMax.com
Saturday, Nov. 9, 2002
WASHINGTON – Tuesday’s election returns may have no immediate effect on the Senate’s obstruction of President Bush’s program for homeland security. And thanks to a backroom deal, it could also prevent quick action on his judicial nominees.

NewsMax.com has learned that Senate Republican leader Trent Lott and Senate Democrat leader Tom Daschle made a pre-election agreement that, no matter how the election turned out, the GOP would not seek to control the committees in the coming lame-duck session. The newly-elected Senate will not be sworn in until January.

As explained to NewsMax by Daschle spokeswoman Ranit Schmelzer, this is the agreement:

If Sen.-elect Jim Talent, R-Mo., takes his seat in time for the lame-duck session (which is allowed because he is filling an unexpired term), or if the independent Minnesotan Dean Barkley (appointed to fill the remaining two months of the late Sen. Paul Wellstone’s term) decides to vote with the GOP, then Lott would be recognized as the majority leader. BUT ...

There will be "no reorganizing resolution” passed. Schmelzer says that means that the chairmanships of the committees will remain in Democrat hands.

In addition to that, the Washington Times reported Friday that Lott and Daschle had agreed the post-election session would last no more than five days.

"Well, that has yet to be decided for certain,” Daschle’s spokeswoman told NewsMax. Lott himself said at a news conference Wednesday that he was "not a fan of lame-duck sessions.”

Lott's Weakness Sabotages Bush

The Homeland Security bill has been bottled up in the Senate for weeks. Any further delay flies in the face of President Bush’s demand Thursday at a White House news conference for a unified Department of Homeland Security before Christmas.

"It is imperative that the Congress send me a bill that I can sign before 107th Congress ends,” he said.

Theoretically, that could happen even with Democrats holding control of the committees. The Senate-approved and the House-approved versions of the measure have been sent to the Senate floor, and can be amended there. The problem is that whereas the House gives the president broad latitude as to how and where Homeland Security employees will be deployed (as is the case with other security agencies), the Senate bill insists on affording those employees union protections that could hobble the new department’s effectiveness in dealing with the war on terror.

If the Republican and Democrat Senate leaders seriously expect to wrap up business in five days, they will have to resolve their differences on labor protection quickly. Given that this involves a powerful Democrat constituency clashing with White House insistence on a bill the president feels he "can sign,” something will have to give, or the measure is dead.

Before the election, neither version of the bill was able to surmount the requirement for 60 votes, or three-fifths of the senators, to avoid a filibuster. As of this writing, the election does not appear to have changed any minds. Lott says securing its approval would be "a big leap.”

Other Bush initiatives remain bottled up in committee. With the Lott-Daschle agreement letting the Democrats keep committee chairmanships, conservative activists are angered that the Mississippian may have yet again caved in to the party of the left, which the voters have repudiated.

NewsMax.com’s repeated efforts for two days to get a statement from the GOP Senate leader’s office confirming, denying or in any way commenting on the deal were unsuccessful.

Watch Out, Judge, He'll Chew You Up

If the deal holds, it means, for example, that Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., can still sit on the nominations of Charles Pickering and Priscilla Owens and other Bush judicial nominees.

Judges Pickering and Owens were voted down in a straight party-line vote in Leahy’s committee, and the chairman refused to send the nominations to the full Senate floor, where it is believed they would have been approved on a bipartisan basis.

Again, theoretically, the committee could now send their names to the floor any day, a normal practice since they have both been accorded hearings on their nominations. If Leahy remains chairman during the lame-duck session, that is not likely to happen.

Why not wait until January, when the GOP will be in firm control of the panel? Further delay gives the radical left-wing groups that opposed them more time to attack them. Phony Anita Hill charges were leveled against Clarence Thomas in 1991 not only to smear him, but also to "raise more questions” so as to delay the nomination process.

Thomas, now a sitting Supreme Court justice, surmounted those attacks. The Pickering and Owens nominations to lower federal courts a decade later were also met with spurious charges that did not fly, but by then the Democrats had dropped all pretense that politics was not a consideration, and refused to send their names to the Senate floor.

Energy Plan, Your Tax Cuts Also Delayed

The Lott-Daschle deal on committee chairmanships, if it holds, will likely block a full Senate vote on them this year. It also makes it improbable that the lame-duck session will be able to deal with President Bush’s initiatives on stalled House-passed energy legislation, which would move this country toward less dependence on terrorist-supporting nations in the Middle East.

The issue of speeding up the schedule for the phased-in tax cuts, which would spur the economy, the same so-called "worst economy since Herbert Hoover” that the Democrats wanted to make a major issue against the president would similarly be put on the back burner.

They'd Rather Go to Disney World

The president's insistence that lawmakers actually do some work to finish the business of the 107th Congress in five days, "set off a thousand groans on Capitol Hill,” editorialized Friday’s Washington Times, adding that "members and staffers had hoped to push off any heavy legislative lifting until next year and cut out of town. Airline tickets and hotel suites, after all, have already been bought.”

The Times says the operative word here is "work.” But that appears to have been trumped by end-of-the-year deal-making that seals forever in the history books the reputation of world’s most deliberative body as "a do-nothing Senate” in the 107th Congress.

-PJ
22 posted on 05/31/2005 12:12:31 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Lott has been looking for ways to undercut both President Bush and Sen. Frist, as he blames both -- though Bush more -- for his political purgatory out of leadership.

Ok, let me get this straight. Bush (along with all conservatives) was unhappy with Lott because he was undercutting the Republican agenda. Lott gets bounced at the first opportunity. Lott thinks the best way to get back into power is more of the same that got him out. Sure, makes sense.

Lott has the emotional maturity of a teen-age girl. Teen-age boys have their faults, but this sneaky, behind-the-scenes, knife-in-the-back duplicity -- and "Who, me?" innocence -- really is more of a girl trait, and it's not attractive in girls. Boys are usually more up-front about what they're doing.

25 posted on 05/31/2005 1:14:20 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Senate filibuster compromise was Lott's idea, not McCain's

http://www.clarionledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050529/NEWS01/505290330/1002/NEWS01


26 posted on 05/31/2005 1:14:38 AM PDT by WKB (You can half the good and double the bad people say about themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Trent Lott is nothing but a rat bas-turd!! If the few true Republicans in the Senate allow him any leadership position, all I can say is that they deserve him.


37 posted on 05/31/2005 5:16:10 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
In fact, Lott was in almost constant contact with McCain and several other allies, including Sen. Lindsey Graham, who joined the coalition later in the negotiations.

The country is going to hell because of activist, left wing judges, but the childish twits in the Senate choose sides and play "king of the hill" in their sandbox.

38 posted on 05/31/2005 6:19:50 AM PDT by Semi Civil Servant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

What a piece of s- article this is. Rumor after rumor after rumor.


43 posted on 05/31/2005 9:09:35 AM PDT by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

I just heard about Lott's duplicitous behavior from El Rushbo!I might have guessed it!!Frist isn't running again,so Lott is "licking his chops"!!!!


52 posted on 05/31/2005 10:51:02 AM PDT by bandleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson