Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Khodorkovsky sentence hurts Russia's reputation - U.S. embassy
Interfax ^ | May 31 2005

Posted on 05/31/2005 1:29:46 PM PDT by lizol

Khodorkovsky sentence hurts Russia's reputation - U.S. embassy

MOSCOW. May 31 (Interfax) - The U.S. government plans to give detailed consideration to the sentence against former Yukos CEO Mikhail Khodorkovsky and his business partner Platon Lebedev, a spokesman for the U.S. Embassy in Moscow told Interfax on Tuesday.

The United States understands the sentence is a rather complex document and Khodorkovsky and Lebedev have the right to appeal, the spokesman said.

A variety of aspects of the Yukos affair, among them reversible tax claims, frozen accounts that could not be used to pay taxes, and dubious auctions have raised a number of serious questions about the rule of law in Russia, independent courts, the inviolability of contracts and ownership rights, and the absence of a predictable tax policy, the diplomat said.

Such actions taken in this case and other court proceedings call into question Russia's commitment to obligations it assumed together with all democratic countries with free, developing markets, he said.

The way the Khodorkovsky-Lebedev case was handled has delivered a heavy blow to Russia's reputation and undermined trust in its law enforcement and judicial system, the spokesman said.

It is in the Russian government's interests to convince the world that the weakness of its law enforcement and judicial institutions will be dealt with promptly, he said.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: khodorkovsky; russia; yukos

1 posted on 05/31/2005 1:29:47 PM PDT by lizol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lizol

They should treat corporate leaders like we do Enron.


2 posted on 05/31/2005 1:34:33 PM PDT by ex-snook (Exporting jobs and the money to buy America is lose-lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol

I'm not sure that this guy should be the poster child for "political prisoners" in Russia. If he were an American CEO who did not pay the taxes, he'd be in jail just the same. The only thing they've got to complain about is the criminal procedures that were utilized. Granted that they need to change their legal system, but I'm sure this is not the only guy who's faced that problem. You'd think that if they were going to make that an issue, then they'd choose someone who was innocent.

Of course, there is always the chance that this guy is innocent, but I'm betting not since Russia is well known as a haven for crooked businessman, and he made himself a billionaire within just a few years--doing who knows what.


3 posted on 05/31/2005 1:36:50 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol

>>It is in the Russian government's interests to convince the world that the weakness of its law enforcement and judicial institutions will be dealt with promptly, he said.<<

Mr. Ambassador and the spokesman for the U.S. Embassy in Moscow ,
Is this an intentional slap at the President about our lack of immigration enforcement and the open borders?


4 posted on 05/31/2005 1:46:20 PM PDT by B4Ranch ( Report every illegal alien that you meet. Call 866-347-2423, it's a FREE CALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Well, I do not remember Russian courts ever acquitting anyone in prominent [i.e. state] cases [and in not-so-prominent as well]. The public prosecutor's office there must be doing a stupendously outstanding job.


5 posted on 05/31/2005 1:50:41 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lizol
"A variety of aspects of the Yukos affair, among them reversible tax claims, frozen accounts that could not be used to pay taxes, and dubious auctions have raised a number of serious questions about the rule of law in Russia,..."

Yes, for those of us who've really followed the case at least a little, we wonder which side the organized crime bosses are on--the same side they were on during most of the 20th Century, perhaps?
6 posted on 05/31/2005 2:13:36 PM PDT by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook

Give them a slap on the wrist and allow them to keep most of their ill gotten gains? Of course we have Mexico dictating to us what to do during our trials, why not we'll dictate to someone else. All this is getting silly.


7 posted on 05/31/2005 2:16:41 PM PDT by jb6 (Truth == Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

His chief of security went away for life for multiple murders of rivals, former top employees, personal scores, etc.


8 posted on 05/31/2005 2:20:00 PM PDT by jb6 (Truth == Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

The head of the National Bolshaviks Lavorov (?sp) was aquitted of plotting a coup.


9 posted on 05/31/2005 2:21:12 PM PDT by jb6 (Truth == Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red6; BrooklynGOP; struwwelpeter; Destro; A. Pole; MarMema; YoungCorps; OldCorps; chukcha; ...

bump


10 posted on 05/31/2005 2:26:02 PM PDT by jb6 (Truth == Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

This is Russian specifics. If somebody is found by the prosecution to be innocent they simply terminate the case before going to court. This is bad because a person never have his innocence proved by court; at the same time, one should be very idealistic to decide to spend another year in jail waiting for acquittal in court when one can go home right away. The courts are too busy and there are not enough judges so waiting for a trial can take a long time. This is all too bad and little is being done to fix the problem, unfortunately. The judges are paid very little money and they are completely not protected from any assaults. There have been several cases of judges being killed by their former "clients". Maybe now something is changing.


11 posted on 05/31/2005 2:37:57 PM PDT by RussianBoor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Well, Martha Stewart went to jail for inside trading. This is peanuts by Russian "standards" of the 1990s. At the same time, prosecution in Russia is often inept and unable to collect proper proof even if the guilt is evident. Again, reforming all this system is urgently required, but, as far as I know, little is being done. That's one of the things one really can blame Putin for.


12 posted on 05/31/2005 2:42:39 PM PDT by RussianBoor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RussianBoor
The importance of a sound judicial and banking system in Russia is so they can get badly needed external investment. No outsider will enter a contract unless there is confidence that it can be fairly enforced. That is why no large oil companies will agree to help with the development of their oil industry.

Much of the present problem, aside from the human inclination to take advantage of a situation for one's personal benefit, is the Clinton administration sent a bunch of leftist Harvard professors, etc., to Russia to help them with their transition from Communism to free enterprise and democracy. Those folks taught Russians their view of politics and business - which is corruption and self dealing. Russia as yet to free herself from that.
13 posted on 05/31/2005 3:45:19 PM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not everything that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jb6

That's Eduard Limonov - a freak if there ever was one. He's a bisexual son of a KGB officer. He's in his 60s and runs around corrupting disaffected kids.


14 posted on 05/31/2005 5:07:37 PM PDT by Romanov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RussianBoor

"Martha Stewart went to jail for inside trading."

That is innacurate. She went to jail for lying to investigators.


15 posted on 05/31/2005 7:15:56 PM PDT by dervish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lizol

sheesh!

why would anyone trust rasputin's byzantine russia now?


16 posted on 05/31/2005 7:17:34 PM PDT by ken21 (if you didn't see it on tv, then it didn't happen. /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol; familyop

"President Bush said on Tuesday that the United States had expressed concerns to Moscow that Russian oil magnate Mikhail Khodorkovsky was judged guilty before his trail and promised to keep watch on how any appeal of his sentence is handled.

"It appeared to us, at least people in my administration, that it looked like he had been judged guilty prior to having a fair trail," Bush told a Rose Garden news conference."

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=805984

This bore striking resemblance to "show trials."

"frozen accounts," "dubious auctions," and suprise, suprise the company in Russian hands. Doesn't sound like there is much respect for private property.


17 posted on 05/31/2005 7:21:54 PM PDT by dervish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dervish

Yup, of all the things, they couldn't make the initial thing stick so lets shop around. As far as oligarches go, she was minor and couldn't mount the multi-million dollar special interest lobby defense.


18 posted on 06/01/2005 9:15:31 AM PDT by jb6 (Truth == Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: lizol
From last year:
Dresdner Bank releases Yukos documents
Novaya Gazeta ^ | October 18th, 2004 | Aleksey Polukhin, Sergey Mikhalych

Original title:
PLUG THE FOUNTAIN!
THE MARKET ECONOMY IN RUSSIA IS NO MORE

Dresdner Bank sends Yukos documents to Novaya Gazeta
       

(photo by Vladimir Pavlenko)
    
       The 'Yukos affair' has reached its culmination. The government's attempt to cover up the opinions of western businessmen during their de facto nationalization of the company has resulted in an international scandal.
       The result is that Russia has lost her business standing, including her ability to attract investment. She has demonstrated to the entire world that the laws of the marketplace do not take precendence to the political and personal interests of those who consider themselves the government.
       The German Dresdner Bank, which conducted an audit of the oil giant Yuganskneftegaza' before its sale, disclosed a net worth much greater than that given by the Russian justice department.
       As a result, Dresdner Bank made an unprecedented decision to publish confidential documents in order to save its business reputation. Now the entire world business community knows the approximate value that the Russian government wants to receive for Yukos - a company which, by the way, has many international shareholders. The Russian government could care less about its reputation, the laws of the free market, or the rules of business etiquette. They explained only that they would sell the firm in the way they felt like.
       Representatives of the Dresdner Bank would not give their estimate of the prevailing situation over the telephone, but expressed their main points. They offered to go over their estimates after first sending Novaya Gazeta an electronic message containing a summary of their audit, which, it turns out, the Russian government had used improperly. From the electronic message of Dresdner Bank (DKW):
       
       
       "Our opinion is based exclusively on economic and marketplace conditions, as well as other circumstance, as we evaluated them at the time of the audit.
       "We concerned ourselves only with an audit of the business itself, and we expressed no views or recommendations relative to any of the actions relating to YuNG (Yuganskneftegaza). In particular, we did not concern ourselves with any of the basic business decisions regarding the separation of YuNG from Yukos, or other such transactions.
       " Furthermore, we did not concern ourselves with the solvency of YuNG in case of its function as a separate enterprise.
       "DKW considered the potential advantages of introducing more advanced methods of oil production worldwide, in order to more effectively evaluate the information provided by Yukos. Such methods were incompletely reflected in the last independent audit of YuNG's production and reserves estimates, but are reflected in the current plans of Yukos's management.
       "Besides the basic task of estimating YuNG's value as an independent enterprise, DKW consulted with the Russian ministry about the potential value of the government's packet of YuNG shares. Upon analyzing their minority packet, one could expect control of YuNG to continue to be exercized by the majority stockholders, and that the government's minority packet would in this case be non-liquid. We assumed certain factors, such as minority shareholder rights, corporate administration, company structure, and limitation of investments costs, would cause the proportional cost of a controlling interest to be discounted, in comparison with a minority packet.
       "DKW considered three scenarios, the basic parameters being the total quantity of oil and gas stockpiles and corresponding increases and reductions in production.
       
       "CONCLUSIONS
       "We estimated YuNG's value, in conjunction with independent estimates of its resouces at the end of 2003, to be US$14.3 billion, which in the opinion of DKW, is an overly conservative scenario for estimating YuNG's net worth as an independent enterprise. After deducting approximately US$2.9 billion in estimated obligations, including Yukos debts which YuNG guarantees, the value of YuNG's joint-stock basis is US$11.4 billion. A scenario assuming the enforcement of a tax liability against Yukos would lower the joint-stock value to US$10.4 billion. In DKW's professional opinion, YuNG net worth as an independent business entity ranges from US$18.6 to US$21.1 billion. After deducting estimated obligations of approximately US$2.9 billion, including Yukos debts assumed by YuNG, YuNG's joint-stock value ranges from US$15.7 to US$18.3 billion. If the assumed tax claim against YuNG enters into law, then its value would drop to a range of $14.7 to $17.3 billion US dollars."
       
       
       
When a serious bank publishes what it was forbidden by contract from revealing, this indicates that: one) it is severing all relations with its contractor, since it now considers the contractor's behavior to be unacceptable for continued business, and two) that it is attemping to salvage its reputation.
       When the Russian ministry agreed to this, it meant that it disregards the opinions of a western business association and its professional estimates.
       And so, it seems that news of the Russian government's latest wheeling and dealing will mean a further blow to the nation's business reputation.
       What has occurred is not just a scandal. It is much worse. It is, in fact, a conscious refusal to economically integrate with the developed nations, and, quite probably, the refusal of decent businesses to integrate with us.
       
       
Following a political revolution, there is an economic one. The government's decision relative to Yuganskneftegaz is that they would sell it however they wanted, to whomever they wanted, in spite of its estimated net value. This means that the market laws in Russia from now on have been declared non-existant, and it will not be surprising if, somewhere in Moscow, a building appears with a plaque reading: 'Gosplan' or 'Goskomtsen' (trans note: communist economic entities). We have already gone through the day when the rubel was valued at more than the dollar, but only because dollars were not used for anything - there was no free market. Just like today. The collection of ciphers which the government will pay itself from the private firm has, in concrete numbers, no real meaning.
       This transaction, in which the buyer and price are known in advance, cannot be called business. The buyer - in reality the government in the form of Gazprom - has dramatically understated the company's value, since money does not mean a thing. It is nothing more than nationalization, concealed from the view of the West, and hidden almost negligently - since our non-market bureaucrats do not understand that reputation is capital. They could care less, when they can do it without cost.
       Any regime can adapt to international standards, if it wishes, but international standards under a vertical government are as useless as trying to drink the ocean.
       
       
The scandal concerning Yuganskneftegaz's value is the first obvious manifistation of the long-awaited collision of Russian bureaucracy with western market institutions. When Russia was in a state of 'wild' capitalism, no one really expected us to play the game according to international rules, or even to obey our own laws. This is why no serious transnational players came to us with long-term plans. The only ones who looked into Russia were speculators, equally prepared to lose a lot of money as they were to realize unprecendented profits. In a word - Russian roulette.
       A change of 'elites' was at first perceived to be positive. Until 2000, it was as if Russia was set 'on default', but fortunately it brought into force standardized macro-economic indices. Up until 2003, the politicians' influence on business was insignificant in comparison to the Yeltsin era, and business had grown strong after ten years of freedom, developing dynamically.
       Russia at last became an interesting destination for investors, and they believed that, if not now, perhaps in three to five years there would be no difference between Moscow, New York, or London. Accordingly, western firms began building their infrastructure here. They opened offices and branches, invited their partners in, and began to work closely with local companies and government agencies. For the time being, they were prepared to endure a certain non-confomity to western standards, which they chalked up to the sins of youth and specific to the character of the locale. China is the mecca for investment. Here the communist party zealously protects the economic rights of foreigners, even to the point of expelling from the party bureaucrats who fine foreign companies in order to pinch their capital.
       The first warning is the 'Yukos affair'. If, at a certain point, it is perceived to be an internal razborka (shakedown) by the political underworld, it will force the west to reexamine its relations with Russia, especially with regards to private property.
       Other alarming symptoms have presented themselves. For example, there have been lawsuits by Yukos's foreign investors, relating to their monetary losses. Now here the foreigners are on guard, for it is a clear threat to THEIR own money which they have invested in Russia.
       The Dresnder Bank (DKW) story has shown us that the russian government is ready to brush off their western partners, to ignore their opinion, to act exclusively according to their own concept of business. This has momentarily returned Russia, in the foreigner's eyes, back to a stage of 'wild capitalism', only this time with a government face.
       
       
The reason for everything is Yukos. Not the firm itself, but the irrational desire by the president and his inner circle to punish disgraced oligarch Khodorkovskiy for plundering Russia. By lowering the oil giant's capitalization by means of absurd criminal cases and made-up tax claims, invariably comfirmed by their own courts, the leadership of this country is trying to convert foreign investors into investors from the government. This is nationalization. The buyer is already known - Gazpromneft. For just this purpose, a 'daughter' company of the gas monopoly was created, and for just this purpose they collected incredibly high production figures (so much black gold has never before been seen in Russia, and never will). For just this purpose, all market-based solutions to the Yukos problem were swept aside, including proposals by western companies.
       The chief business enterprise of Yukos, Yuganskneftegaz, has become the main piece to be swallowed up (by the government). Arguments about its value are extremely serious. The western partners of Yukos are following the potential sale closely, and the company's management is not going to give up without a fight. For this reason, it was necessary to come up with an independent estimate of the firm's value. Dresnder Bank was selected by the government of the Russian Federation, and both signed a confidentiality agreement.
       The practice of closed audits is typical of Russia, especially with respect to government business entities. One must somehow camouflage the ineffectiveness of bureaucratic management, so that it did not become a subject of public or parliamentary debate. Closed audits have been performed for Gasprom and the Russian Central bank, as well as many others.
       There was no sense in this. It was merely to observe the rules of the game, in the eyes of the western business community, and allow the government to enter into negotiations with 'clean boots and a hanky'. The documents were primarily for internal use, for departmental evaluation. Western investors knew whom they could trust with their money and whom they could not, and what were the guarrantees.
       But DKW falls into a special situation. It has become one of the main players in a spectacle which the whole world has been following for more than a year. Accordingly, the risks to the nation's reputation have been aggravated to the limit. In the West, reputation is a basic capital. The bank, therefore, made a 'disloyal' decision with regards to its customer, and gave an estimate (of the oil company's net worth) which more or less corresponded with reality. DKW, moreover, immediately specified that its report was not to be used for further actions with regards to Yuganskneftegaz, but as something more along the lines of an analytical summary. Covering their tails as much as possible, the Germans sent the estimate to their customer (the Russian government).
       What followed, however, can only be called a set-up. According to the government: "The head of the justice ministry's main directorate in Moscow, Aleksandr Buksman, officially declared that the independent estimate perfomed by German auditors at Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein (DKW) showed the main oil-producing 'daughter company' of Yukos (Yuganskneftegaz) to have a value of 10.4 billion dollars." (By the way, there are rumors that foreign news agencies attributed this statement not to the unknown Buksman, but personally to Putin's press secretary Gromov.)

       Focus your attention here: DKW is named as the author of Yugansk's sale price. Furthermore, the 10.4 billion figure is the low value, which the Germans termed 'overly conservative'. Naturally, western business 'could not understand' DKW's act - many had already performed their own estimates. The Germans, in turn, 'could not understand' the justice ministry, who had just struck a blow to their business reputation.

       Naturally, it is a serious struggle, but one which is hidden from the public. As a result, the justice department has reached an unprecedented decision, to sanction the publication of this confidential report. DKW, meanwhile, took an even more unprecedented step, they published the entire document. In the report's finale, Dresdner Bank wrote: "The given opinion is governed exclusively in accordance with Russian law". Who knew, other than the justice ministry (!), that in signing this agreement, that Russian laws would only be enforced according to government whim.
       Commentary from Russian officials soon followed: yes, they estimated it this or that way, but we will sell it for $10.4 billion anyhow. This confirms once again that the DKW report was merely a fig leaf, and since the government did not succeed in doing this (the sale) without witnesses, they now state it openly. After falling for this small provocation, moreover, the justice ministry has gone onto a bigger one - 68.7% of Yugansk stock will now be sold at a 60% discount as a 'minority' packet. (On exactly how a packet of stock greater than the controlling majority can be a minority, the market laws are silent.) As a result, the firm will fall under the complete control of Gazprom-affiliated businesses for a mere 4 billion dollars.
       No one really expected Yugansk to be sold at a fair price, not even desperate idealists. In this context, it would be better if Yugansk were priced analogous to the government company FAUFI, everything would then remain at the level of a Russian razborka, in which the firm had endured a series of everyday troubles. Now the scandal has gone international in the full meaning of the word.
       From now on, every foreign company is right to fear that contacts with the Russian government will cast a shadow over their reputation. The 'Iron Curtain' has appeared once again, not from that side, but from ours. Consider the government's growing penetration into the economy, and their growing desire to find enemies outside our borders who just want to bite off a 'bigger piece' of us.
       Today's pseudo-elite thus far are only weakly realizing that they have convinced themselves of an illusion. A vertical strengthening of the nation's internal structures automatically extends beyond the borders. Attempts to export our politico-economic system are doomed to failure - the West has already run into similar exports during the days of the USSR, and will therefore take asymetrical and rigid measures against it. Long ago, they learned how to get by without us.
       A high-stakes game does not pay attention to such trifles, however. The talk is not just about the banal, though very large, properties of a fallen oligarch being converted for use by some government elites. The attack on Yukos it seems is similar to the cannon shot from the Aurora, and the sale of its greatest asset, Yuganskneftegaz (or more likely, its transfer from one hand of the government to the other), is like the storming of the Winter Palace. People afterwards found themselves waking up in a different country.
       There is not just a virtual democracy in our country, but a virtual free market as well. After Yugansk, it is now possible to do anything, even to foreigners. Focus your attention on this - DKW was not simply thrown away, but cynically used and later brushed off. Yes, they made their report, now we will just do it our way.
       So, it seems that the western journalists were correct: the Yugansk story is the regime's existential choice. A choice for a closed and opaque economic policy, for something like a subsistence economy with only one milk cow in the form of the gas monopoly.
       If this is this case, then the West will treat us like a milk cow. It is likely that Russia will now face many long years of integrating with international business, either through the WTO, or the European Union. Our investment rating, which not too long ago caused such national euphoria, is nothing more than a derivative of the petroleum situation. No businessman will pay attention to this rating, knowing that he can be cast off, or in general simply used like toilet paper.
       The end of the Yukos affair, judging from everything, is now at the point of no return. The West will cease to trust the Kremlin's economic policies, and this trust is needed in the long run. To build a mere 'economy of the pipeline', as in Venezuela, no free market is needed. All that is needed is to manage the labor battalions.
       
       Aleksey POLUKHIN, Sergey MIKHAILYCH


19 posted on 06/01/2005 10:28:08 AM PDT by struwwelpeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot
Oh yeah!!! Now the same guys teach everybody democracy.

Actually, big companies like BP feel themselves pretty comfortable. They can count on some "gray" influence. The real sufferers are small and medium businessmen, both Russian and foreign, who cannot "solve problems" by calling certain big guys. Those are the people who especially need protection by the law and do not get it.
20 posted on 06/01/2005 1:43:07 PM PDT by RussianBoor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson