Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Uhhuh35
Uh, he tried to cover up the Watergate break-in. Nixon was way ahead in polls, I never could understand why he thought he had to spy on ANY Demoncrat. I was only 9 at the time.

During this election, it was revealed that John Kerry had a mole in George Bush's election campaign, so that he could find out what his talking points were going to be. How is this any different than Nixon's campaign placing a bug in the Democrats office to find out the same thing?

128 posted on 06/01/2005 11:15:59 AM PDT by chudogg (www.chudogg.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: chudogg

The Bush campaign willingly employed the Kerry mole. The Nixon campaign burglarized a private office in the Watergate complex (and several others). Burglary is a crime.

The difference is a little matter of breaking the law, then paying the burglars to keep quiet, stashing the hush money in a foreign bank, and then ordering the CIA to call off the FBI investigation because it involved activity outside US borders.

And much, much more. What a mess.


144 posted on 06/01/2005 11:38:06 AM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson