He's Dead Jim!
Posted on 06/01/2005 5:04:40 PM PDT by F14 Pilot
AMSTERDAM (Reuters) - The European Union was in disarray on Thursday after the Netherlands followed France in resoundingly rejecting the bloc's new constitution, possibly stalling future expansion and disrupting decision making.
The rejection of the charter by two of the six countries that founded the bloc in the 1950s could deal a fatal blow to a treaty designed to make the EU run more smoothly following its enlargement from 15 to 25 states last year.
The votes also cast doubt on the EU's hopes for a stronger foreign policy and its plans to expand further to the western Balkans, Turkey and Ukraine, and raised questions about its appetite for economic reform amid mounting global competition.
The Dutch "No" vote of 61.6 percent was even more decisive than the nearly 55 percent scored by French opponents of the treaty. Turnout was also a strong 62.8 percent, well above the 39 percent in last year's European parliament election.
EU leaders urged member states to press on and ratify the constitution, but analysts said they should admit the document is dead. EU leaders are due to decide how to proceed when they meet for a regular summit on June 16-17.
"To have such a very, very large turnout after the French vote but also to have such an overwhelming "No" is really crushing for the constitutional treaty," said Richard Whitman from the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London.
Dutch Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende, who was criticized for a lacklustre "Yes" campaign, could face a parliamentary vote of confidence on Thursday but it has little chance of success. Balkenende has said he would not quit.
Latvia's parliament is expected to approve the treaty with a big majority on Thursday, meaning 10 members representing almost half the EU's 454 million citizens will have approved it.
European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso called on member states to proceed with ratification and not preempt their summit meeting with "unilateral decisions" before then.
UNCERTAIN FUTURE
Britain faces a decision next week on whether to suspend or go ahead with legislation to pave the way for a referendum.
Poland said on Wednesday it would decide how and when to ratify the constitution after the EU summit. It had planned a referendum in October, but the opposition has demanded a delay.
The Czech Republic said on Wednesday it would seek an extension of the November 2006 deadline for ratification to give countries that vote "No" more time to reconsider.
Luxembourg Prime Minister Jean-Claude Juncker voiced concerns on Wednesday about the July 10 referendum on the treaty in his broadly pro-Europe state after the Dutch "No."
"I myself and others must plead the European cause with lots of vigor," he told reporters in Brussels.
Juncker, whose country holds the EU presidency, also said the Dutch and French rejections do not alter the economic fundamentals underpinning the euro, despite the single currency touching a new eight-month low after the Dutch result.
The euro has fallen by nearly 10 percent from its level in mid-March, when markets began factoring in the possibility of national rejections of the treaty.
Former European Central Bank chief Wim Duisenberg agreed with Juncker that the euro should not suffer lasting damage, but said the votes would be a blow to economic reforms in the bloc.
"The political uncertainty created will hamper the efforts in Europe to introduce more structural reforms which are so very, very necessary," Duisenberg told CNN television. "It will take us a couple of years at least to reassemble ourselves."
The result is also likely to make it harder for EU leaders to reach a deal on the long-term EU budget, already difficult because of a looming early German election.
Dutch Finance Minister Gerrit Zalm signaled the Netherlands would toughen its demands for a cap to the EU budget after the "No" vote and push for a cut to the Netherlands' per capita contribution, which is the highest of all 25 member states.
The votes could cast doubt on the EU's plans to expand further. Romania and Bulgaria are likely to join in 2007 as their accession treaties have already been signed but membership bids by Turkey, Ukraine and Balkan hopefuls might be disrupted.
"Enlargement is going to be one of the big casualties of this decision," said Mendeltje van Keulen, analyst at the Clingendael Institute near The Hague.
"Romania and Bulgaria have probably just got in time ... but for Croatia or Turkey it's a different story."
So do we.
Ahhh... that reminds me I haven't looked this week: from junkscience.com's home page:
Kyoto has now cost over 43.5 Billion dollars.
It has achieved a max of 0.00045 degree lower temp by 2050.
Europe's pretty much as it was 72 hours ago. The dream of a centrally-controlled superstate is the only thing that's in crisis.
You're right. All of the stories I've heard the last couple of days ask the same question: "Now what do we do?".
You s**tcan the whole thing, that's what you do.
I could swear that a week ago the Euro was going to reduce the US to third world status. The empty bloc.
The U. S. MSM is including themselves in the implied we.
Try a constitution that starts, "We the people of ... in order to form a more perfect union do ordain...."
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Jamais reculez á tyrannie un pouce!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! Never give an inch to tyranny!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
IOW, forget inviting in the Muslims, nobody in their right minds wants them included.
"Alright, that's enough! The treaty says all must approve. TWo haven't. Treaty dead. Why are we still having this conversation about this maybe being the end of it?"
Because we're talking about socialists here. You know, the people who vote against it before voting for it.
That's it! People believe it because they're too poorly educated to examine the sentences they hear. That's why I teach (Call me an idealist if you like).
He's Dead Jim!
"People believe it because they're too poorly educated to examine the sentences they hear. That's why I teach (Call me an idealist if you like)"
I'm glad you're a teacher. My dad (the greatest one in the world) was a teacher. But is it only that they're too poorly educated, or does being shallow have anything to do with it?
They act as they believe ... as they have heard and seen.
The most sensible, concise analysis I have heard on this subject. And I have read all, and I mean ALL, of the articles and their threads on FR concerning the vote in Europe. Some way to spend your vacation.
Evidently, the EU elite are going to keep on having these referendums in countries that vote "no" until they finally win one. On the other hand, in any countries voting "yes",
there will be no further votes and no reconsiderations will be allowed. Like the Hotel California, you can check but you can't ever check out. (Kinda like the U.S., no?)
I was thinking, how about more time to let the countries that voted "yes" have the option to reconsider. Oops, to re-vote after "yes" would be trying to overturn the will of the people.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.