[Radioactive]

I saw a report by CNN just minutes after the attack on the pentagon.

They reported no evidence of any plane hitting the pentagon.

I was in Washington the day it happend and saw the pentagon just after the attack.

There is no way an airplane could have hit the pentagon as we were told.

We were told the aircraft...a Boeing jet flying 2 feet above the ground would have hit automobiles on the freeway just a few hundred yards from the pentagon.It would have made massive damage of the grass just in front of the pentagon.....guess what...no damage at all.

There would have been more damage (at least in 150 feet of the center of the impact zone) because of the wings hittig the building.Also the wings would have sheared right off and would have been left outside the pentagon.

If you look at the photographs of the pentagon after the impact, you will see reels of cable that were undamaged by the supposed impact of the Boeing Jet.THey would have been destroyed by an aircraft hitting the pentagon as we were told.

I don't know what happend to flight 77, but it did not hit the pentagon.

And don't bother trying to change my mind on this. There is nothing you can say or type that that will change my mind on this.

I was there shortly after and no way was this an aircraft hit.

If it was, have the government release the tapes of the cameras that video taped the whole incident.

They haven't and won't.

[sinkspur]

I was there shortly after and no way was this an aircraft hit.

Congratulations. You've just entered the annals of Free Republic kookdom.

You join such esteemed former posters as Justine Raimondo, Harry Callahan, and Michael Rivero.

You're destined to live, forever, at the margins of society, peering over your shoulder wondering who might be following you, voraciously reading the newspapers in early June to find out where the latest Bilderberger confab is being held, and forever standing on street corners, trying to convince passersby that the 1969 moon landing was enacted on a Hollywood sound stage.

[Snickersnee]

And don't bother trying to change my mind on this. There is nothing you can say or type that that will change my mind on this.

Textbook case of cranio-rectal inversion! The symptoms are all there!

[MJRitter]

This wasn't a plane crash either then, eh?



It was an AT-72, lost near Roselawn, Indiana.

[LdSentinal]

I have a friend at the Pentagon on 9/11 who saw the plane hit the building.

And he's a proud Bush-hater.

[AntiGuv]

I was in New York City on 9/11 and I can guarantee ya that a plane hit the South Tower of the World Trade Center! Granted, that's not saying much since everyone saw it on TV.. I actually went back to Ground Zero a month ago for the first time since '01 and was amazed by how compact the site seemed to me (that was striking, because I'd heard so many comments about how "vast" the space looks, which is the total opposite of how I perceived it).

Anyhow, getting to the point, there used to be this website that had mpeg clips of every network and news channel covering that day. You could watch the entire replay for that day, and then clips of coverage for at least the week after. In any case, back in '02 I watched the alphabet network coverage & the 24 hour news channel coverage over and over. I remember the initial coverage of the Pentagon much as you describe.

One thing I would stress however is that things were very chaotic that day, to state the obvious, and it's not odd if the initial reports were erratic just as initial reports often are. By example, just earlier this week they initially reported that 50 houses slid off that cliff in Laguna, CA and it turned out to be a dozen or so.

Whatever the case, I should go to hell for posting this, but you might find this site interesting: Pentagon Strike.

[Kath]

BS. I know someone who works at the Pentagon. Have known him all my life and have kept in contact with him. When I finally was able to get through to him he told me he was coming in work a bit late due to sick kids. He was approaching the Pentagon and saw that plane hit it. You don't know what you are talking about. Because you didn't see it doesn't mean it didn't hit. There were people who did see it hit.

[weegee]

Maybe Flight 77 disappeared over the Bermuda Triangle.

They should have wrapped the black box in tin foil.

[Sonny M]

There is nothing you can say or type that that will change my mind on this.

I would love to see you tell Ted Olson this, he lost his wife in the plane that hit the Pentagon.

[Kirkwood]

[Figment]

What about the thousands of eyewitnesses that saw the plane hit the Pentagon? Are you really that stupid?

[endthematrix]

"If it was, have the government release the tapes of the cameras that video taped the whole incident."

A series of security photos details the September 11 airliner attack on the Pentagon. CNN's Jamie McIntyre reports (March 7)

Play video

(QuickTime, Real or Windows Media)

[investigateworld]

I too wish they'd release everything. I saw a crash site in Cerritos, CA DC 9(?) and wings don't fold into the fuselage when they strike solid objects. Just saying what I think, fire away!

[ActionNewsBill]

If it was, have the government release the tapes of the cameras that video taped the whole incident.

They still haven't released the tapes from the OKC bombing.

Why should they start now?

Of course, that happened under Clinton, so a conspiracy in that case is more believable to some folks.

[Beckwith]

And don't bother trying to change my mind on this.

What mind?

[hershey]

There were many witnesses to the plane hitting the Pentagon, including several on the highway nearby who gave detailed accounts of what they saw.

[Paige]

Barbara Colson was on the plane as were elementary school students from Washington, D.C. You people are a trip. If you want conspiracies go dig into Clinton's past and then get back with us if you can find the time. Remember it won't do you any good. Clinton had the MSM covering for him. Oh and one other thing, have you thought about taking up another hobby such as meditation? It does calm one down.

Thanks!

[Hegewisch Dupa]

There would have been more damage (at least in 150 feet of the center of the impact zone) because of the wings hittig the building.Also the wings would have sheared right off and would have been left outside the pentagon.

You need to learn less physics from Bugs Bunny cartoons.

[UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide]

Also the wings would have sheared right off and would have been left outside the pentagon.

That did not happen at the WTC. The impact films of the second plan show the wings disappearing into the building with the fusilage with no apparent resistance whatsoever.

[cmsgop]

You can't be serious, Thats Crazy Talk, See a Doctor ASAP!

[dirtbiker]

From "Popluar Mechanics", March 2005 Issue, In the case of Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon, one wing hit the ground, the other was sheared off by the force of the impact with the Pentagons's load-bearing columns. A crashing jet doesn't punch a cartoon-like outline of itself into reinforced concrete buildings. What was left of the plane flowed into the structure in a state closer to a liquid than a solid mass. "If you expect the entire wing to cut into the building, it didn't happen." The small 12 (not 16) foot hole made in the "C" ring of the Pentagon was probably made my the planes landing gear, not the fuselage. Computer simulations confirm the findings.

Believe it or not at your own risk, but if you don't, keep it to yourself, less people believe you for a fool....