Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Standard deviance - redefinition of bad behavior as "normal" (thanks to "progressive" liberals)
WORLD MAGAZINE.COM ^ | JUNE 6, 2005 | MARVIN OLASKY

Posted on 06/06/2005 7:55:00 PM PDT by CHARLITE

Anne Hendershott, a professor of sociology at the University of San Diego, boldly uses in the title of her latest book, The Politics of Deviance (Encounter, 2004), a word that many dare no longer speak.

WORLD: Is anything deviant anymore?

Hendershott: We have become reluctant to label behaviors "deviant." Drug abuse, promiscuity, abortion, and even homosexual acts are all behaviors that in the past were viewed as quite deviant. Today, in many cases, these behaviors have been normalized—or, as the late Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan said, we have "defined deviancy down."

I was curious how that happened and decided to look closely at some of these behaviors to understand the process of redefinition. I found that in the current politics of deviance, the power to label—and remove labels from—deviant behavior has moved away from the religious realm and been seized by influential interest or advocacy groups. Women's groups and gay-rights organizations, for instance, now have the ability to silence speech by those with whom they disagree. Health-care professionals and advocates have succeeded in medicalizing drug abuse and other behaviors.

WORLD: What's wrong with viewing drug addiction as a disease?

Hendershott: On the surface, medicalizing drug abuse is viewed as compassionate. In some "treatment" programs, such as methadone maintenance or harm-reduction programs in which hypodermic needles are supplied to IV drug users, the addict is enabled to "live safely" with his or her addiction. Yet, the reality is that drug abuse is a moral problem and needs to be addressed morally—not medically. This is why faith-based drug treatment programs are often much more successful than the medicalized programs.

WORLD: And meanwhile, we are medicalizing many behaviors.

Hendershott: Yes, many that in the past were viewed as disruptive, eccentric, or simply "bad." The new mental illness designation given to unruly children and adolescents has now progressed from Attention Deficit Disorder to Oppositional Defiance Disorder—replete with medication protocols. Adults, too, are increasingly being labeled. In San Diego, we had a case in which a surfer claimed "surf rage" when he was arrested for nearly beating a fellow surfer to death for invading his "surf space."

Behaviors like "shopping addiction" have been identified. A woman in San Francisco successfully sued her company for its unwillingness to make reasonable accommodations for her compulsion to wash, brush, and then rewash her hair for up to three hours each morning if it did not feel right. The 9th Circuit Court ruled that when her employer eventually fired her for being late, it was without cause—because of her mental illness.

WORLD: And some also want accommodation for what you call the "sexually adventurous adolescent"?

Hendershott: I chose that chapter title after reading about the social science response to a major syphilis outbreak among suburban teenagers in Conyers, Ga. In Conyers, a large number of very young teenagers were engaging in promiscuous sexual behaviors—some with more than 100 partners. The behavior led to a syphilis epidemic in the upscale suburb. While shocking, the response from some women's groups and sociologists was even more shocking. Deborah Tolman, a research scientist and director of the Adolescent Sexuality Project at Wellesley College, suggested that girls are entitled to their own sexual desire or sexual pleasure and that "good" girls or "nice" girls are depriving themselves of a full life. Ms. Tolman's article, "How Being a Good Girl Can Be Bad for Girls," is a classic redefinition of deviance in which what has been regarded as "good" is recast as "deviant" and what was seen as bad becomes "normal."

WORLD: Can Christians do anything to remoralize public discourse?

Hendershott: Some religious leaders have become reluctant to speak publicly of morals at all—and in their place, a powerful advocacy community stands ready, willing, and able to redefine deviance for us. —•


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: behavior; ethics; medicated; morals; newnormal; redefinition; society; standards

1 posted on 06/06/2005 7:55:03 PM PDT by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Muslim religious leaders are not reluctant to speak out against immoral behavior. On the steadfastness of the pastorate, their religion is better than ours.


2 posted on 06/06/2005 8:01:46 PM PDT by ReadyNow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReadyNow

Well, talk is one thing, and action is another. These guys talk while their "subjects" run around killing people to support their religion which is their politics.

They still smell of treachery, murderous terrorism, and radical fundamentalism. No separation of church and state with these sub-humans.


3 posted on 06/06/2005 8:05:08 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

What about personal responsibility? Seems to be something we tout very often. It seems to me that someone's parents can influence their morals far more than "women's groups and gay-rights organizations." Those groups can try to say what they wish, but really, no one is forcing an adolescent to be promiscuous, or do drugs, or become aggressive. If someone's kids are messed up, it is most likely their own fault, not the liberals.


4 posted on 06/06/2005 8:08:50 PM PDT by psychoknk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReadyNow
Muslim religious leaders are not reluctant to speak out against immoral behavior.

Do you really want to go there?

Do you really want to compare the moral behavior of muslims, who justifies all manner of death and destruction in the name of their god, to the morals of Christians?

Granted that Christians aren't perfect, but muslims are worse.

5 posted on 06/06/2005 8:11:44 PM PDT by Noachian (To Control the Judiciary The People Must First Control The Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Michael Savage had her on his show a few months back...very interesting stuff!!


6 posted on 06/06/2005 8:24:53 PM PDT by SweetPilotofCanuckistan (DeLay/Laura Bush '08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
It's known as aligning the contemporary moral baseline with the lowest common denominator - the 'progressives' classic manipulation of a cultural construct to acheive the maximum ratio of mindless serfs to free-thinkers and individualists. Modern liberals - and their ideology - must be exterminated in order for the human species to have a hope for a promising existence.


7 posted on 06/06/2005 8:34:29 PM PDT by Viking2002 (.............needs more cowbell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

You are, say, fat, or homosexual, or a drunk. These modern science freaks say it's in your genes. You are biologically predestined (or nearly so) to be fat, homosexual or drunk. But--surprise!--one day you wake up and decide you've had enough, and you stop eating too much, drinking booze, or going after people of your own sex. Turns out that--maybe--you really weren't born that way, after all!


8 posted on 06/06/2005 8:39:33 PM PDT by guitarist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

95% of the population fall within two standard deviations of the normal.


9 posted on 06/06/2005 9:05:51 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. = Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
"Today, in many cases, these behaviors have been normalized . . . "

Especially homosex, thanks to the Mass. Supreme Court who 'normalized' the abnormal sex practices of three per cent of the population.

Yeah, that's a real paradigm shift, right? Didn't think so.

10 posted on 06/06/2005 9:53:40 PM PDT by Eastbound (Jacked out since 3/31/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
In 1958, then FBI agent Cleon Skousen wrote the book "The Naked Communist." An excerpt, "Current Communist Goals" outlined the goals of communism in the U.S. It was read into the Congressional Record (Appendix, pp. A34-A35)on January 10, 1963.

Some of the goals are right on target re this post:

24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.

25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

11 posted on 06/07/2005 1:15:47 AM PDT by OnRightOnLeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Thanks for the post. We discussed this article and several others during our "Worldview" class at church this evening.
12 posted on 06/29/2005 6:08:15 PM PDT by SLB ("We must lay before Him what is in us, not what ought to be in us." C. S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson