[GipperGal]

Personally, what I don't understand is why it's such a big f***ing deal whether homosexuality is genetic or not. Do they think that being genetic makes it ipso facto morally legitimate? Well then, as onyx mentioned, why not say that pedophilia is morally legitimate? I mean, for all we know pedophilia is also genetic. So they are only doing what is natural to them. (And believe me, folks, I'm convinced that this sick argument will be made in the not too distant future to legitimize lowering the age of consent so that pedophiles can prey on children with more ease).

My point is that it doesn't matter what causes it. It's dangerous and unhealthy. I have no idea whether alcoholism is genetic, but I do know that it is also dangerous and unhealthy. There used to be a time when dangerous and unhealthy behavior was not celebrated simply because the people who engaged in it were "born that way."

[scripter]

Whether it's genetic or not is actually very important. For the longest time, homosexuals insisted they were born that way but there was never any supporting scientific study. If there's no genetic factor then a whole new range of responsibilites from parents come into play.

But everything we see tells us the major factor is environment. I can't stress enough the importance of folks reading this article: How Might Homosexuality Develop? Putting the Pieces Together, or even better, read the book A Parent's Guide to Preventing Homosexuality.

I am not singling anybody out when I say this, but many folks have a profound ignorance on this subject. They think they know but they really have no idea. And this thanks to the politically correct main stream media. It's sad, and we must get the truth to as many as possible.