Posted on 06/07/2005 4:51:37 AM PDT by Coop
Reprinted with permission from the National Review, 6/20/05
Dr. Frist's Operation
How the Senate majority leader played a game of filibuster chicken
by BYRON YORK
NATIONAL REVIEW/JUNE 20, 2005
On the morning after a group of 14 senators made a deal to end the standoff over Democratic filibusters of Bush judicial nominees, Senate majority leader Bill Frist found himself taking flak from all sides. Depending on who was speaking, Frist had wimped out, was unable to control his troops, or could not muster the support to trigger the "nuclear option" to put an end to the filibuster problem entirely.
And that was just from conservatives. Other commentators said Frist had lost the leadership of the Senate to John McCain. Still others argued that he could not do his job while entertaining hopes of becoming the GOP presidential nominee in 2008. The Los Angeles Times suggested he resign.
All in all, it was a tough period for the majority leader. But did he really deserve all the criticism? Republicans came out of the filibuster showdown with six previously filibustered nominees headed for confirmation, and, perhaps more important, in a strong position ultimately to break all the Democratic judicial filibusters, should it come to that. And much of the credit for that, according to interviews with several people closely involved in the fight, belongs to Bill Frist.
Frist's entire strategy rested on one key decision: his commitment to use the nuclear, or, as he prefers to call it, the constitutional option. Once Frist decided that, unless Democrats backed down from their filibusters, he would exercise the option--a parliamentary maneuver that would allow him to cut through the filibusters with a simple majority vote--every threat he made was a credible one. When he said he intended to act, he meant it, and his determination became the force that drove events.
There seems little doubt that Democratic leader Harry Reid got the message. While Frist threatened, Reid made a series of successively more accommodating offers of compromise. At first, when it was not fully clear that Frist was committed to going ahead with the constitutional option, Reid tried to settle the conflict by offering to drop his party's opposition to a group of three Michigan nominees to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. It wasn't a serious offer; Democrats had never opposed any of the three on ideological grounds and were instead blocking them at the behest of Sen. Carl Levin, who remains angry to this day that two Clinton nominees from Michigan, one of them related to Levin by marriage, were not confirmed by the Republican Senate. Democrats were probably going to abandon their position anyway, so why not, some reasoned, offer the Michigan judges as a bargaining chip to Frist?
Frist rejected the offer. Then Reid became a bit more serious, coming back with a new proposal: Frist could have the three Michigan nominees plus one of the three most "controversial" Bush nominees, Priscilla Owen, Janice Rogers Brown, or William Pryor.
Frist again said no and continued preparing for the nuclear showdown. Then Reid came back again, offering the three Michigan nominees plus two from the controversial group. Once more, Frist refused.
As the days went by, Frist never moved from his position. When NATIONAL REVIEW asked a source close to the majority leader, "At some point, does it make sense to deal?" the source answered, "No. The leader is very adamant about this because [making a deal] would never solve the problem." And that was that.
By then, everyone, including Harry Reid, knew Frist intended to go nuclear. After days of talking, the Gang of 14, the so-called "moderates" who had appointed themselves to negotiate a settlement, realized they had to work quickly, because Frist would soon take action. So another offer came to the table: Democrats would give Frist the three Michigan nominees, plus Owen, plus Brown, and plus Pryor--all of the most controversial Bush choices.
Sources say that Frist was kept closely informed of everything that went on inside the negotiating room, but did not control events there. (In contrast, it appears that the deal-seeking Reid was fully involved in his senators' negotiations.) In the end, Democrats in the Gang of 14 agreed to filibuster future nominees only in "extra- ordinary circumstances" but left it to themselves to decide what those circumstances would be. Republicans expressed reluctance to use the nuclear option but did not forswear it either. The GOP won a Democratic pledge not to filibuster the six judges, while the fate of four others was left undecided.
It was a clear win for Republicans, who gained up-or-down votes for their most fought-over judges while not conceding anything. But it did not "fix the problem" of filibusters, the necessity of which Frist's aides had asserted so often. And even as the deal was celebrated in the press--it was for a few days seen as a Democratic victory, until the extent of Democratic concessions finally set in--Frist was eager to make clear that it wasn't his doing. In response to an inquiry from NATIONAL REVIEW, a Frist aide sent a copy of an uncompromising statement Frist had made on the Senate floor, accompanied by a note that read, "This deal was not Senate leadership's capitulation. We didn't agree to it, and don't intend to acquiesce to the deal... In short, we intend to continue to fight for up-or-down votes on each and every nominee."
Frist was saying as much himself. He made clear that he would continue to seek votes on each nominee, and he also made clear that he believed nothing at all would have happened without his threat to go nuclear. "Without the constitutional option, Priscilla Owen would never have come to a vote," Frist said. "Neither would any of the other nominees... Without the constitutional option, the minority would have adhered to the path it was on and deal-brokers would have had no deal to broker... If filibusters again erupt under circumstances other than extraordinary, we will put the constitutional option back on the table and will implement it."
And he will most likely have the votes to do it. After the Gang of 14's deal was announced, two GOP senators, Ohio's Mike DeWine and South Carolina's Lindsey Graham, made clear that they would vote to implement the nuclear option if Democrats resumed their filibusters. That would give Frist the 50 votes--plus Vice President Dick Cheney's tiebreaker--that he needs to make it happen. (Graham's offer came after he found himself under withering criticism back home for joining with Democrats in the compromise; "The calls won't quit, and they're almost all against Lindsey," the head of the South Carolina GOP told The State newspaper.)
Meanwhile, as Frist reiterated his determination to win votes for all of Bush's nominees, Reid was almost desperately trying to rid himself of the issue. "I think we should just move on," Reid said to Frist on the Senate floor. "Filibusters don't happen very often. I think we should move beyond this and get the business of the country done. Let's not talk about the nuclear option anymore. Let the Senate work its will. Let's get over this... Let's just move on and not talk about this anymore."
Fat chance. Reid quickly found that Frist was in no mood to move on to other issues when the majority leader immediately moved to confirm the judges covered in the agreement. In the end, his threat to go nuclear had forced Democrats to give in, exactly as planned. The situation reminded Republicans of the late 1970s, when Democratic senator Robert Byrd, then the majority leader, had used the same threat to force the GOP opposition to surrender. "If you look back at history and how these things have played out, it always ended up this way," says one Republican not closely allied with Frist, "meaning that the other side caved, and that's basically what happened here."
In addition, Frist kept working because he knew the battle was about more than just Owen, or Brown, or Pryor. It was about the next Supreme Court nomination, widely assumed to be coming sometime this year. How the Senate stalemate was resolved would determine what kind of judge George W. Bush could nominate. Would it be a judge who could be confirmed with a simple majority vote--the standard that has prevailed in the Senate for more than 200 years--or would it be a judge who would have to win 60 votes to survive a Democratic filibuster? That could mean the difference between a Clarence Thomas and a David Souter.
Frist is preparing for the former, not the latter. "We have set the stage," says the Republican who is not in Frist's inner circle, "for President Bush to nominate a 51-vote Supreme Court justice, as opposed to a 60-vote Supreme Court justice." That is what the filibuster fight was, and is, about. And, at least for now, it appears that Bill Frist is winning.
The desire to vote for Hillary or Chuckie Schumer for any reason is a clear indication of mental illness. I suggest you seek a doctor.
Bump for later read
Frist appears to be going for the jugular. The Senate schedule looks to be non-stop nominations as far as the eye can see. (And anything that keeps them from passing more laws is probably a good thing anyway...)
That's a great point.
Remember when the (USFL?) cratered and sued the hell out of the NFL. They proved their case in curt and had the foolishness to say all the wanted was a dollar and principle.
Do you remember the dollar? Do you remember the principle?
Yes. No.
I know what you mean. The same old gut-feeling that we may have been had still hasn't subsided fully.
That said, I'm glad to read this about Frist, hopefully things are under control better than they sometimes appear.
As someone who has been frustrated, critical and disappointed, I can say this for certain - Frist has achieved results. Too bad the sheeple don't understand McCain's treachery in the compromise agreement, but his narcissism would never have overwhelmed him if not for Frist sticking by his principle of every judge getting an up or down vote.
I just wish one day he'd give us reason to nickname him the Fist so we could have the Hammer and Fist. That would be cool. Senators need to be led, even more than in the House. The Representatives are like sheep (in a good way), they know they need a leader. The Senators all think they're God's gift to the US, and they need to be busted into line. That takes a strong will and political force.
Excellent post.
Tony Snow remarked on this show that some of these Gang of 14 (like Collins, Graham, Nelson) have insisted nominees will get an up or down vote. I'll echo Tony's subsequent comment:
"They'd better get it! They'd better...!"
:-D
Sure I am!
I'm helping my wallet stay fat.
And when the time comes I will help the GOP using McCampaign 527s.
And if that aint good enough, just like the Senate GOP Fd President Bush and US Rep voters, too Fn bad.
And dont tell me about Dems then getting back in POWER, they are already back in POWER.
Got to admire a minority that KNOWS how to throw it's weight around and frown on a majority that doesn't KNOW how to yeild the POWER given them by the US voter.
You got another WHAT?
Who said I'm not voting?
Do you equate giving $ directly to the inept party with actaully casting a vote?
You're right. Well, except for the White House, Senate, Congress, a majority of state legislatures, etc.
Graham has become the lightening rod....and will pay a price.
The main thing i've gotten from all this so far is that the "7" aren't conservatives. They've all signed away their credibility. If it comes to a primary vote between Frist and McCain....it's Frist. McCain sucks waffles.
You may think it would be smart for the Senate Demodogs to force a cloture vote on every single nomination to dogcatcher, as well as every other item of business, but I don't.
Would they be penalized by the voters? - I believe, yes.
Would it hurt the country? - I believe, yes, though you may simply wish that no business ever be done by Congress, and there are times I could agree with that.
Even if the C.O. had succeeded (and it was clearly very close) that would not have prevented extended "debate" on each and every nominee before the vote being taken - instead of the Demodogs conceding in the normal business manner of "unanimous consent" and quick (often voice) votes on many "non-controversials".
This is better (as far as THIS particular Congress is concerned) whether Frist had the votes or not. If this works out to keep the Senate functioning, it is easy to imagine that it could be much worse than this.
As far as future Congresses, I agree with you that it would be good to have this question settled for all time.
That's my point exactly.
Reps at every stage and yet the Dems are running the show.
So thanks for pointing out how inept our elected Senate Reps are.
I'm more than happy to assist you with your points. Lord knows you need the help.
ball to play with....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.