Well, who do you like better, Forrester or Corzine? Time to hold you nose and flip the lever next to the (R).
Unless you are of the It-Has-To-Get-Worse-Before-It-Will-Get-Better school of thought. Of course, we just sacked our utterly corrupt Donk governor after a gay sex scandal where he was installing his Boy-Toy as head of Homeland Security. So I don't know how much worse it can get...
"Well, who do you like better, Forrester or Corzine? Time to hold you nose and flip the lever next to the (R)."
Nope!
Been there, done that ... Christie Whitman ETC.
Can't do it anymore.
"Unless you are of the It-Has-To-Get-Worse-Before-It-Will-Get-Better school of thought. Of course, we just sacked our utterly corrupt Donk governor after a gay sex scandal where he was installing his Boy-Toy as head of Homeland Security. So I don't know how much worse it can get..."
I have principles and I am sick and tired of settling for less. As far as I am concerned the difference between Corsine and Forester is moot. THey're cut from the same cloth. They only vary by nano degrees.
Well I'm in the NJ-COUNTRY-CLUB-RINOS-NEED-TO-LEARN-A-LESSON-SCHOOL.
I voted twice for Christine Todd Whitman on your logic that the alternatives (in those elections, Florio and McGreevey) were worse.
Whitman then went ahead and
(1) appointed some of the worst activist Leftists we've ever seen to the NJ Supreme Court;
(2) vetoed a completely reasonable parental notification law; and
(3) messed up state finances when she had a golden opportunity to reform them.
What good did we ever get out voting for Christie Whitman, I ask you?
In retrospect I think it might actually have been better for the Dim to win, screw up royally, and end up getting the public ready to accept a real Republican. (And on a side note, that might've happened last year if we'd been allowed to have an election right after the McGreevey fiasco.)