Skip to comments.
Genes drive ability to orgasm: Scientists say DNA exerts strong influence on whether women climax
Nature Magazine ^
| 8 June 2005
| Roxanne Khamsi
Posted on 06/08/2005 3:40:51 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-166 next last
Now please, gentlemen ... this is a serious article from Nature, a highly-respected, peer-reviewed science journal. Behave yourselves accordingly.
To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
EvolutionPing |
A pro-evolution science list with over 280 names. See the list's description at my freeper homepage. Then FReepmail to be added or dropped. |
|
|
|
2
posted on
06/08/2005 3:42:21 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. The List-O-Links is at my homepage.)
To: All
3
posted on
06/08/2005 3:46:00 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. The List-O-Links is at my homepage.)
To: PatrickHenry
"It's a taboo subject,"
LOL! There's been nothing taboo about the female orgasm for the last 20 years! It's all some women even discuss and it's been on Broadway for pete's sake.
4
posted on
06/08/2005 3:50:24 AM PDT
by
Arkie2
(No, I never voted for Bill Clinton. I don't plan on voting Republican again!)
To: PatrickHenry
Interesting that this was published after Mother's Day but before Father's Day. Wonder which parent passes along the "best" genes.
5
posted on
06/08/2005 3:55:36 AM PDT
by
bd476
To: PatrickHenry
Can it get anymore ridiculous than this?
So laughable!
I now click on evolution threads expecting humor.
6
posted on
06/08/2005 4:00:09 AM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: PatrickHenry
A woman's genetic make-up accounts for at least a third of her ability to climax during sex, say researchers, and may even account for as much as 60%. Well, there goes my W & W theory.
Wine and Barry White ...
7
posted on
06/08/2005 4:04:21 AM PDT
by
dread78645
(Sorry Mr. Franklin, We couldn't keep it.)
To: PatrickHenry
Good...yet ANOTHER thing Stephen Jay Gould was wrong about.
8
posted on
06/08/2005 4:05:08 AM PDT
by
Pharmboy
("Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God")
To: PatrickHenry
Medications for male erectile problems, such as Pfizer's Viagra (sildenafil citrate), have already given men more options, says London-based relationship therapist Ruth Mitchell. Folks, look no further than this sentence. It simply fails to discuss how looking at the gene's of men brought about Viagra - oh, wait a minute. Maybe that is because Viagra was discovered outside of genetic factors! So, this article, and research, has one motive: promoting EVOLUTION, using sex as bait.
I bet the authors spent a lot of time in the magazine asiles looking at Hot Rod magazine, and noting the cars always had a pretty girl w/ them. I can see the cover of Hot Evolution now!!
9
posted on
06/08/2005 4:05:38 AM PDT
by
gobucks
(http://oncampus.richmond.edu/academics/classics/students/Ribeiro/Laocoon.htm)
To: bd476
10
posted on
06/08/2005 4:08:19 AM PDT
by
gobucks
(http://oncampus.richmond.edu/academics/classics/students/Ribeiro/Laocoon.htm)
To: PatrickHenry
"It's a taboo subject," explains Tim Spector, who directs the Twin Research Unit at St Thomas' Hospital, London, and co-authored the report. Proving once again that the old saying, "No sex please, we're British" is still true.
11
posted on
06/08/2005 4:09:07 AM PDT
by
Veto!
(Opinions freely dispensed as advice.)
To: PatrickHenry; pissant
Some jeans have the same effect on me.
To: Larry Lucido
Actually, it just proves that men named "Gene" are fantastic lovers...
13
posted on
06/08/2005 4:13:41 AM PDT
by
ken5050
To: PatrickHenry
To: PatrickHenry
So what function does the female orgasm serve? Who cares? </Sam Kinison>
15
posted on
06/08/2005 4:26:38 AM PDT
by
SC Swamp Fox
(Aim small, miss small.)
To: PatrickHenry
An interesting hypothesis. I visited PubMed in order to find the paper this article discusses, and got no matches, so the paper is likely still waiting to be printed. However, that means we may not see the exact methods employed by the researchers. Seeing as the achievement of the subject of the article includes many factors that are poorly accounted for (such as mood and the level of happiness with one's partner, whether the study subjects are married or unmarried, et cetera), methodology is a concern.
16
posted on
06/08/2005 4:28:21 AM PDT
by
AQGeiger
(Have you hugged your soldier today?)
To: PatrickHenry
"Genes drive ability to orgasm:" I realize I might be behind the curve, but is orgasm a verb?
17
posted on
06/08/2005 4:30:34 AM PDT
by
OldEagle
(We might be in the end times, but it looks like we are finally moving in the RIGHT direction.)
To: anniegetyourgun
"Thanks Mom & Dad....."
;D!
18
posted on
06/08/2005 4:34:29 AM PDT
by
poobear
To: OldEagle
I realize I might be behind the curve, but is orgasm a verb?Merriam-Webster says that it's not. I've also heard the word used as a verb many times.
19
posted on
06/08/2005 4:35:53 AM PDT
by
AQGeiger
(Have you hugged your soldier today?)
To: PatrickHenry
Well, thank gawd, its not my fault!
:]
20
posted on
06/08/2005 4:35:54 AM PDT
by
Adder
(Can we bring back stoning again? Please?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-166 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson