Posted on 06/08/2005 2:06:44 PM PDT by venizelos
It seems that the Soros network is determined to keep pushing until America pushes back. Their latest project is the defilement of one of our nation's holiest sites -- Ground Zero of the World Trade Center attack.
A group of Soros-funded "human rights" organizations have hijacked the planning process for The World Trade Center Memorial which will nestle among the footprints of the fallen towers. The cabal plans to use the memorial as a pulpit for leftwing propaganda.
Visitors to the memorial, "will be served up a heaping foreign policy discussion over the greater meaning of Abu Ghraib," writes Debra Burlingame in yesterday's Wall Street Journal (read the full text on David Horowitz's blog, here). Burlingame continues:
"The public will have come to see 9/11 but will be given a high-tech, multimedia tutorial about man's inhumanity to man, from Native American genocide to the lynchings and cross-burnings of the Jim Crow South, from the Third Reich's Final Solution to the Soviet gulags and beyond. ... The public will be confused... Where, they will ask, do we go to see the September 11 Memorial? The World Trade Center Memorial Foundation will have erected a building whose only connection to September 11 is a strained, intellectual one."Miss Burlingame's brother Charles F. "Chic" Burlingame III piloted American Airlines Flight 77, which crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11. She serves on the Board of Directors of the World Trade Center Memorial Foundation.
Spearheading the Ground Zero memorial atrocity is the International Freedom Center (IFC), a recipient of "generous" funding from George Soros's Open Society Institute (OSI). Two other Soros-funded groups, Human Rights First and the ACLU, have also played leading roles in radicalizing the memorial.
Don't miss Michelle Malkin's new column today, which rips into the "Blame America Monument" planned for Ground Zero.
How long is it going to take to get the ACLU recognized as a terrorist organization?
And why won't the REPUBLICAN GOVT change the laws concerning the settlements of lawsuits to help stop these scumbag commies?
I am getting very fed up with the ACLU. They are really pissing off alot of Americans.
When it comes down to it, thier first amendment rights are gonna get trumped by patriots utilizing the second amendment. And I pray it comes sooner than later.
AMEN!
>I am getting very fed up with the ACLU. They are really pissing off alot of Americans.
Yes, but fear not; they will be first up against the wall when the Republic is restored. For now...patience.
Not to be picky, but there's nothing "holy" about the WTC site. Solemn, yes, meaningful, yes, holy, no.
Abraham Lincoln said at Gettysburg: "We are met on a great battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of it as a final resting place for those who died here that the nation might live. This we may, in all propriety do. But in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate, we cannot consecrate, we cannot hallow this ground. The brave men, living and dead who struggled here have hallowed it far above our poor power to add or detract."
The word hallow means "to make holy."
The only people for whom the WTC event would be holy are the Islamokazis, and I sure don't share their opinion of the event.
When the Republic is restored?
Is every place one or more people died considered holy? The Murrah Building site, Waco, etc.?
Battlefields are commonly referred to as "hallowed ground." I'm a little puzzled as to why so many on this thread find the point controversial.
Actually, I guess only two people on this thread find it controversial. Still...
I guess I don't view the WTC site as a battlefield, but a rather the site of a horrific tragedy. To classify it as such demands the same distinction for the Murrah site, since the latter was also an act of terrorism.
demands the same distinction for the Murrah site, since the latter was also an act of terrorism
We must say it was an act of Iraqi terrorism (see Jayna Davis' book "THE THIRD TERRORIST"). We simply can't let Clinton get away with that lie too.
Please elaborate, I haven't heard anything about this.
Please elaborate, I haven't heard anything about this.
In Jayna Davis' book "THE THIRD TERRORIST" it is documented that a man got out of the Ryder truck on the passenger side when McVeigh got out of the driver's side. Jayna has two credible witnesses (as I recall) who saw that (there also was a story out last year during the Nichol's trial which had Fed's notes which apparently commented on a surveillance tape which can't be found NOW which also mentioned a passenger in the truck).
So, you have a FEDERAL investigation which shows two Lilly WHITE Americans blew up a building.
On the other hand, you have a TV reporter (Jayna) which has numerous witnesses in OKC which says there were Iraqi defector soldiers from Gulf War I in OKC involved with Nichols and McVeigh.
SO who's lying (or mistaken?)?
Well the answer is that Clinton, when he first heard of the OKC bombing said "I hope it's not Middle Eastern Terrorists."
Twenty four hours after the initial APB went out for two middle eastern men in a Ford pickup truck things changed and law enforcement is no longer looking for Arabs (Iraqis), they have the ties Clinton needed.
You see, Clinton in his infinite wisdom had his posterior handed to him in the 1994 Elections and to get reelected he needed these right wing nuts to be guilty, Iraqis killing Americans wouldn't go over well in 1996.
Enter Gorelick (a member of the 9-11 commission)to put law enforcment on the PROPER track, and you have the headlines Clinton needed to get reelected.
Think about the CONSPIRACY theories out there: The government says one thing, witnesses say something else.
Everyone puts their brains in automatic and believes the NY Times.
History will show us (our generation) to be "BEYOND STUPID" if we don't start kicking the truth into some of these events.
By the way, with the 9-11 commission simply covering for Clinton a few things start to make sense:
1. 9-11 commission complaining about NYFD!
2. National Security Advisor Sandy Berger stuffing top secret documents into his pockets while "preparing" for the 9-11 commission (they couldn't let the commission see some of the notes because not all of them are totally brain dead).
3. Richard Clark starting the 9-11 commission out by blaming Bush! This is a typical Clinton tactic, blame the other guy FIRST. He does this time after time....
History is a little different than you thought....
I'm always open to learn, but I'm not one to subscribe to conspiracy theories. I'll need more than hearsay to believe white supremists conspired with Iraqi defectors on a project.
Assuming for a second these mysterious Arabs exist, is it not a stretch to assume these "Iraqi defectors" were acting on behalf of a foreign govt? How did "witnesses" know these men were from Iraq, and when they emigrated here?
Terrorists have many colors: IRA, Eric Rudolph, The Unibomber, FARC, Basque Separatists, Shining Path, the person or people responsible for the anthrax mailings, etc. So you see, it is quite possible that non-arabs perform acts of terrorism. The nineties especially witnessed an uptick in anti-government sentiment and violence, partially in response to Waco and Ruby Ridge.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.