Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I hope this guy is a FReeper.

"...So, to restore some comity (and common sense) to your editorials, here is my advice. The next time your lesser angels insist on publishing "Bush lied," try typing, "Bush's mother wears combat boots." Then sleep on it for one night, and see which statement sounds sillier the next morning.

You will have a better paper if you do."

Terry Larkin, Minnetonka, is a business consultant.

1 posted on 06/10/2005 6:21:01 PM PDT by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: bitt

That same "Bush lied" letter appeared in all the newspapers across the country.

I think it's Howard Dean's "Shock and Awe" campaign.


2 posted on 06/10/2005 6:25:55 PM PDT by MikeHu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt
Saddam; the mass murdering, racist, woman-hating, tyrant; did not give Bush or anyone else in the world any reason to trust him. If Saddam was not hiding anything, then why did he act like he had something to hide? Was he just playing a silly game with the President and the rest of the UN? Nobody in their right mind believes that.
4 posted on 06/10/2005 6:37:56 PM PDT by LifeOrGoods? (God is not a God of fear, but of power, love and a sane mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

I have not read a newspaper in over a decade.

I don't think I'll read one again any time soon.


6 posted on 06/10/2005 6:42:21 PM PDT by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt; All

shameful editorial at the Boston Glob, trying to justify it's disgraceful behavior...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1420695/posts


7 posted on 06/10/2005 6:51:45 PM PDT by bitt ("There are troubling signs Bush doesn't care about winning a third term." (JH2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

This "Lied" stuff drives me nuts. I guess they assume GWB had conculsive evidence that no WMD existed in Iraq. Well, what kind of evidence does the non-existence of anything produce. Well- NONE. One only gets reports or evidence of the EXISTENCE things. That evidence it turns out was INACCURATE or the analysis was FAULTY. If GWB knew with certainty that there existed no WMD are intelligent services are stunningly awesome or GWB is omnipotent.


12 posted on 06/10/2005 7:20:05 PM PDT by ALPAPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Clinton laid.


15 posted on 06/10/2005 7:38:32 PM PDT by jigsaw (God Bless Our Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

bookmark


16 posted on 06/10/2005 8:03:40 PM PDT by chaosagent (It's all right to be crazy. Just don't let it drive you nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt
What Did The Democrats Say About Iraq's WMD
18 posted on 06/10/2005 8:29:39 PM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Am I dreaming or did Cohen and Mad Maddie really make the rounds of all the Sunday talk shows toting a 5 lb bag of sugar to demonstrate how dangerous Saddams WMD were?


22 posted on 06/11/2005 7:53:31 AM PDT by csmusaret (Urban Sprawl is an oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson