Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coleus
In 1999, Nelson and Cranford published their arguments for removing Wendland's feeding tube in the Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy, which is sponsored by the Catholic University of America law school. They describe Wendland as "minimally conscious"—since they could not reasonably label him vegetative—and argue that for such individuals who cannot communicate, "Their biographical and personal life is over."

This man used an electronic wheelchair to get around and replied to questions.

These people are far more evil than the radical islamics.

14 posted on 06/11/2005 7:04:07 AM PDT by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MarMema

" These people are far more evil than the radical islamics."

I totally agree! It's difficult to realize there are people who actually think like those in the article. They are literally promoting the killing of innocent people. The scary part is they are in postions of power and influence over others.

I wish Pope Benedict would speak out loudly against these so called bio-ethics experts. They appear to NOT know the meaning of the word ethics.




19 posted on 06/11/2005 8:02:14 AM PDT by Pepper777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: MarMema

I can't believe a wife would do this. I would give years off my life if I could have my late husband back even like that.


29 posted on 06/11/2005 10:48:01 AM PDT by Goodgirlinred ( GoodGirlInRed Four More Years!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson