"They had MASSIVE amounts of evidence there and it was ignored."
And that is the most significant diffference between these cases. OJ bought the shoes worn by the killer. OJ would fit the gloves if not for having shrunk from the dried blood. Blood stains, etc. Jeez, that was physical evidence badly handled by the idiot prosecutors.
In Jackson's case, the star witnesses have a history of false suits, lying, and tampering. Everything was circumstantial. "He has porno, so he's guilty".
God forbid should any child walk through an Army barracks where there is typically porno mags. Would every soldier be guilty of having molested the child if the mother gold digs?
I would love the discussion of this case to center on the facts presented as evidence. If someone wants to say Jackson is guilty, by all means present the evidence as presented in court. I'd be happy to discuss it and change my mind that I don't think he was guilty of molestation.
Good Lord, How many children, from totally different families had to give testimony under oath that JUST HAPPENED to say the SAME THINGS in order for YOU to believe this CREEP molested them? (I'm not talking about just this trial either). But the fact that one other boy DID come forth at this trial and seperate from this boy DID state the same thing was PROOF POSITIVE that this happened. That was PROOF ENOUGH that this happened. And we as a society need to error on the side of children when it comes to MOLESTING children!
REMEMBER, in both SEPERATE SITUATIONS:
1) HE GAVE THEM JESUS JUICE
2) HE FONDLED THEM
3) HE MASTERBATED THEM
4) HE BOUGHT THEM GIFTS
5) HE SLEPT WITH THEM
6) HE TOLD THEM HE LOVED THEM
7) HE WROTE THEM LOVE LETTERS
8) HE TOOK SHOWERS WITH THEM
Children who have been molested often have blackouts and are embarrassed to talk about it.
How many children does it take?
What this jury did was just gave Michael Jackson a LICENSE to MOLEST CHILDREN for the rest of his life!
They say Pedophiles are the hardest people to stop. Imagine stopping Michael Jackson now!
I feel so sorry for the little kids who will suffer the sick perverted evil that this jury, who was so enamored by Michael Jacksons celebratory status, has now allowed to happen.
Obviously, you're one of those who can't see past the "stars"!
God forgive all of you who think this way, or are inclined to think this way!
Here are the facts. This isn't Michael's first turn in the turnip truck. The kid was believable even though his mom was a jerk. Witnesses proved the alcohol, and porn (pictures of kids with their butts hanging over the fence).
Look - you don't pay off kids when you have nothing to hide.
Let's not forget the child's ability to identify certain parts of his body.
Are you claiming that IF you were in a Army barracks and a soldier allowed your child to look at child porn/other porn, gave him alcohol, and let the child get close enough to identify marks on his body you wouldn't have a problem with it?
ROTFLMAO