[shellshocked]

"Wonder why there was a trial?"

Excellent question. Try: Over zealous prosecutor looking to make a name for himself. Backfired, didn't it? All "evidence" presented was unbelievable witnesses and weak circumstantial evidence.

Why else did we have a trial? Because we don't lynch people because we heard media sound bites that got us all emotional to convict someone.

[kcvl]

All "evidence" presented was unbelievable witnesses and weak circumstantial evidence.

BS!

[Checkers]

Time to wrap this thread up for the night.

Good night.

[eeriegeno]

Excellent question. Try: Over zealous prosecutor looking to make a name for himself. Backfired, didn't it? All "evidence" presented was unbelievable witnesses and weak circumstantial evidence. Why else did we have a trial? Because we don't lynch people because we heard media sound bites that got us all emotional to convict someone.

Wait a minute! The prosecutor filed one charge of child molestation. A grand jury, subsequently, recommended 11 charges of molestation, conspiracy, and alcohol related charges? If anyone was over zealous, it was the grand jury who heard the evidence, not Sneddon?

Jackson may have skated on the first and second attempt to land his wierd ass in jail but he probably won't on the third! And there WILL be a third IMHO. Pedophiles do not self-rehabiltate........