[Dimensio]

To an Evolutionist, typically, there is little to debate because they believe their theology is above reproach based on the idea that it is, of course, immune from the "fallacies" of religion and therefore the only true science.

Why do creationists invent such bizarre "explanations" as to why evolution is still accepted by biologists in the futile attempt to pretend that the only reason that it still stands is that no one has brought forth a credible challenge to the theory? If they spent half as much time doing real research as they do coming up with tinfoil-hat conspiracy theories on a secret cabal of scientists dedicated to support what is allegedly the biggest and longest-running hoax on professional biology (often claimed to be a direct attempt to destroy religion and, with it, all of Western Civilization), they might actually have a real claim to bring to the table.

[TitansAFC]

Why did you even respond to the post?

In just a few posts (#44-#48), you've managed to corroborate evErything I just said.

Challenged the motives of those who dared question you, rather than the science. Declared all challenges to your beliefs "uncredible." Ranted on about how nobody has done half as much research as you or they'd obviously have no disagreements (a very funny claim in my particular case). Declared no other theories as "equal" to your own. And, as is unusually common at FR on this topic, you have declared that you've read my mind and found tinfoil-hat conspiracy theories.

You have just made everything I said true.