Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/14/2005 10:03:34 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Michael J. New, a Cato Institute adjunct scholar, is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Alabama.


2 posted on 06/14/2005 10:04:57 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... The War on Terrorism is the ultimate 'faith-based' initiative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
Whether this measure passes or not, a toughened Gann limit is still needed to keep a lid on spending and encourage lower taxes. It falls short of what's required but in politics the enemy of the good is insistence on the perfect. Bear in mind the Democrats oppose even a weak restraint on spending cause to their mind, it sets a precedent regarding the type of government we ought to have here in California.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
4 posted on 06/14/2005 10:15:45 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

The underlying premise is that the legislature can not be trusted to be fiscally prudent. That is why the initiative is even out there. It is a sorry state of affairs that only the blunt instrument of a ballot initiative is available to the taxpayers of the state of California.


5 posted on 06/14/2005 10:40:22 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge; calcowgirl; Carry_Okie; dalereed; Amerigomag; tubebender; hedgetrimmer; forester; ...

Hain't this been purdy much whut yew been saying, calcowgurl??? I thank it is, by Golly!!! Shazzam!!!


8 posted on 06/14/2005 2:47:41 PM PDT by SierraWasp (Arnold Schwarzenrenegger is Cauleeforneeah's Greenievenator!!! He's infected with GANG-GREEN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

"Under this proposal, spending increases would be limited to average revenue growth for the previous three years."

What a pile of BS, what is needed is a reduction in the size of government and elimination of useless "services" and the personel that man them.


9 posted on 06/14/2005 4:16:23 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
"This proposal would limit how much government could expand during times of prosperity"

What ever happened to the word "Shrink"?????????

10 posted on 06/14/2005 4:37:59 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The Lord has given us President Bush; let's now turn this nation back to him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson