Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: theDentist

Article says:

"the jury found that the couple's heavy smoking violated a more general clause banning 'any nuisance; any offensive noise, odor or fumes; or any hazard to health.' "

The smoke and odor were invading the neighboring apartments. When I rent an apartment I like it to be free of my neighbors' noxious odors. It's like loud music or other noises: you can make noise, but not so much that you disturb the neighbors. These smokers could smoke, but not so much that they disturb the neighbors.


8 posted on 06/16/2005 5:43:06 AM PDT by cracker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: cracker

Agreed. This is the precedent-setter that the Smoking Nazis have been praying for.


11 posted on 06/16/2005 5:50:12 AM PDT by theDentist (The Dems have put all their eggs in one basket-case: Howard "Belltower" Dean.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: cracker

I pity the Indian couple that moves in next to you and uses curry in their cooking.


67 posted on 06/16/2005 6:26:04 AM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Liberals are blind. They are the dupes of Leftists who know exactly what they're doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: cracker

Does all the whining by the non-smokers constitute being a nuisance or"offenseive noise"?


155 posted on 06/16/2005 12:18:21 PM PDT by ampat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson