Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rodney King
The Space Shuttle was conceived as a cheaper way to get materials in orbit to build Space Stations.The Space Station program is now in moth balls but the 30 year old designed vehicle to build them lives on.
12 posted on 06/16/2005 6:43:14 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Semper Paratus
The Space Shuttle was conceived as a cheaper way to get materials in orbit to build Space Stations.

I don't think that's the case at all -- an unmanned rocket is the cheapest way to move payloads into orbit. If anything, the shuttle was conceived as a more effective way to get human labor into orbit to built space stations.

17 posted on 06/16/2005 6:47:39 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Semper Paratus

You are right, and I think the space shuttle / space station relationship is far more circular. We need the space shuttle to help build space stations. We need space stations as a destination for the shuttle. Billions more are needed to support 1970's technology (space shuttle) so the inexpensive programs that return a lot of interesting data get the chop.


20 posted on 06/16/2005 6:49:41 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Semper Paratus
"The Space Station program is now in moth balls but the 30 year old designed vehicle to build them lives on."

Uh, no. But thanks for playing.

Yep, Shuttle's old, but it's still the best available. Anywhere. The next generation is coming, right now.
55 posted on 06/16/2005 7:24:34 AM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Semper Paratus
The Space Shuttle was conceived as a cheaper way to get materials in orbit to build Space Stations.The Space Station program is now in moth balls but the 30 year old designed vehicle to build them lives on.

I would state it differently:

The Space Shuttle was sold as a cheaper way to get anything to orbit. It was designed primarily to bring things back, such as satellites, raw materials from NEOs or finished goods from low G manufacturing facilities, but Luddites like this guy constantly cut back all of the useful stuff the STS should have been doing so it was left with the tasks that largely should have been done by big dumb boosters. The Space Station program was hijacked for political purposes and as another corrupt boondoggle by the Clinton mafia so even that mission was compromised. The fact that it is now "in moth balls" instead of having been finished 15 years ago is because the Earth first kooks like this guy have been fighting every space program since Sputnik.

But the 30 year old vehicle design which was crippled by Congressional libs (who think more like this guy than like Chuck Yeager or Robert Heinlein) continues to lumber on, and is all that is left to us... till Burt Rutan and his ilk have their way. All we'll have to do then is keep the bureaucrats from regulating them to death.

82 posted on 06/16/2005 8:15:07 AM PDT by Phsstpok (There are lies, damned lies, statistics and presentation graphics, in descending order of truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Semper Paratus
WRT 12 the cheapest way to get a lot of stuff into space was the Saturn V system that was scuttled by the government and NASA after there was much enlightenment in media that Germans, possibly Nazis, were the engineering force behind the Moon missions, which was correct BTW.

The Saturn however was not the best way to get stuff back from space. The Air Force needed research into solid rocket boosters for the MX so that was part of the plan with NASA. Newly developed C-C materials for re-entry purposes was part of the development plan as well. They were piggy-backed and worked out.

Overall, what I regret, is that about a generation and a half of talent was not mentored on manned space technology as the shuttle has been the system that has required so much money to maintain and fly over the years. The loss is the thousands of technical people who have done other things than work on space technology and the generations of others that will not have the chance, if the shuttle flies again.
167 posted on 06/23/2005 11:15:00 AM PDT by Final Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson