Should Donald Rumsfeld's Pentagon employ "rough" or "soft" interrogation techniques on terrorists and sworn enemies of the United States who are captured on the battlefield?
Thanks for taking the attention away from Wheezy Conyers's ridiculous salivating over the Downing St. memo--aka the Downing Street Op-Ed--which proves absolutely nothing except someone had an opinion about US buildup to the war. (The big revelation seeming to be that George Bush planned to go to war before the first shots were actually fired--who knew?!)
Apologize, Dick. Or I will urinate on a copy of the Downing St. Memo down the toilet and get you Democrats REALLY mad.
Several real-life examples were given about what our sodiers are doing to get info to SAVE American lives, including mentioning the Army officer who had to retire for firing a gun too close to the ear of a terrorist in order to get info TO SAVE THE LIVES OF HIS MEN, GOING OUT TO BATTLE the terrorists.