[wyattearp]

Some kids who attend public school don't participate in any 'extracurricular' activities...by your definition they are also only 'part-time' and not fully participating.

Wow. I don't know how you managed to define what I said in this manner, but you sure did do it. I guess I'll try this again.

If a student is enrolled in a public school they can either participate in that school's extracurricular activities or not. If a student is NOT enrolled in that public school then they do not have any right whatsoever to participate in that school's activities.

If a student is enrolled in a public school and they are learning disabled or don't speak english well, and they spend half of the day with tutors, they are still enrolled in that public school. If they are enrolled in that school then they can participate in extracurricular activities.

If a student has been pulled out of the public school system, and is being home-schooled, then they should have no expectation whatsoever of being able to participate in extracurricular activities of the school that they are not even enrolled in.

[Born in a Rage]

That is your opinion. However, it isn't justifiable due to the points I've made in other posts. It's prejudicial, discriminatory, and a matter of taxation without representation.

[BobS]

If homosexuality and promiscuity are rampant in any puplic school, a parent should get paid to put their children someplace else.