[wyattearp]

However, it isn't justifiable due to the points I've made in other posts. It's prejudicial, discriminatory, and a matter of taxation without representation.

I re-read what I posted, and what you have posted, and I have no idea where this comment is coming from. I said nothing prejudicial or discriminatory, and I feel that I addressed the points in the post that I was responding to.

As for taxation without representation, that is exactly the point that I am trying to make with regards to vouchers. If tax money is taken out of the public school system and delivered to home-schoolers, or charter schools, or whatever, then I have no representation whatsoever on how that money is being spent. It is a direct violation of my rights as a taxpayer and a citizen.

[Born in a Rage]

I'm not for vouchers. I never said I was. I've posted tons of articles at FR over the years about why people should be against vouchers.

The discrimination lies in letting some kids partake in school activities and not letting others partake in those same activities even though they clearly want to and pay for them.