Sierra growth to bring more congestion, development, report says

Bakersfield Californian ^ | 6/21/05 | Don Thompson - AP

[hedgetrimmer]

Overall, a third of the Sierra is privately owned,

ONLY a third???? Well the government is going to run these property owners out soon enough.

[Inyo-Mono]

Don't worry, all the other Californians moving over there are quickly and drastically changing the nature of that state to that of CA. Soon you won't be able to tell em apart...They are very near changing NV into another "blue voting" state!!!

Las Vegas has been taken over by Los Angeles exiles (they went blue in the last election) and now the Reno/Tahoe area is being invaded by lefties from the "Bay Area." God help rural Nevada.

Only a fraction of my side of the Sierra (Eastern High Sierra) is privately owned, most is Federal land administered by the BLM and Forest Service. The SBC is having an "informational meeting" here next week to help indoctinate the locals.

[Grampa Dave]

The nattering Nannies will drive up the property value in your area to match it down in the wine country or higher.

[SierraWasp]

Which, in turn, will make it impossible for my children to afford a home without mortgaging their souls to some damned bank, just like the State has done due to spendthrift LIEberals and a Governor that wouldn't "cut, cut, cut!!!" (like he said he would)