Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BMC1

Ah, scuze mem but that dirty book contains an explicit permission to lie to non-believers, so any oath taken on it would be pointless.


10 posted on 06/21/2005 3:11:43 PM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: konaice

You're right. That piece of trash does tell them they can lie.

Of course they don't need an excuse to lie. It comes as second nature.


24 posted on 06/21/2005 3:16:57 PM PDT by BMC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: konaice
Ah, scuze mem but that dirty book contains an explicit permission to lie to non-believers, so any oath taken on it would be pointless.

Ah, scuze mem but that dirty book contains an explicit permission to lie to non-believers, so any oath taken on it would be pointless.

Deserves repeating.

53 posted on 06/21/2005 3:27:12 PM PDT by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: konaice
...explicit permission to lie to non-believers so any oath taken on it would be pointless.

Exactly! Keep that thing out of our courtrooms.

81 posted on 06/21/2005 3:42:19 PM PDT by meema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson