Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

She-Male Bill Pushed By Senator Ted Kennedy (Democrats Still Forging Ahead With Pro-Gay Agenda
TraditionalValuesCoalition ^ | June 9, 2005 | Staff

Posted on 06/22/2005 6:39:59 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist

Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) and Sen. Gordon Smith (R-OR) are pushing passage of a hate crimes bill that will include federal protection for cross-dressers, drag queens, transsexuals, and she-males (individuals who maintian both male and female sex organs for bizarre sex acts).

This dangerous pro-homosexual bill is called the Local Law Enforcement Enhancement Act of 2005 (S. 1145).

...The legislation is ostensibly designed to aid local law enforcement officials in prosecuting hate crimes. What it actually does is make "sexual orientation" and "gender identity" into federally-protected categories equal to race or ethnicity under federal law.

Transgender activist groups have lobbied for years to convince homosexual activists that "gender identity" should also be a federally-protected category. If this legislation passes, she-males, drag queens, and every other bizarre sexual behavior will be considered a civil right to be given federal protection.

...In 2003, the Senate Republican Committee also published a detailed analysis of the Kennedy/Smith hate crimes bill--and why it should NOT be passed: "The Kennedy 'Hate Crimes' Bill: An Unwise Proposal."

(Excerpt) Read more at traditionalvalues.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; US: New York; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: 109th; crossdressing; fatteddydrunkagain; homoagenda; homosexualagenda; morfordites; shemales; tedkennedy; thechappaquiddickkid; transgendered; transsexuals; transvestites
***...Still waiting for a Senate Democrat Committee to publish a detailed analysis of the Kennedy/Smith hate crimes bill, and in their own words why it should NOT be passed. ***

I wonder how long it will take the Democrats to get around to doing this?

1 posted on 06/22/2005 6:39:59 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Looks like the Cutty Sark has finally rotted Chappaquiddick Ted's brain.


2 posted on 06/22/2005 6:43:44 AM PDT by deadeyedawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All; little jeremiah; EdReform; scripter

To read the Senate Republican Policy Committee Analysis of the Kennedy/Smith Hate crimes bill:

http://rpc.senate.gov/_files/CRIMEcr071503.pdf


To contact your Senators and Representatives concerning this:

http://capwiz.com/traditional/dbq/officials/


3 posted on 06/22/2005 6:43:59 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
pushing passage of a hate crimes bill that will include federal protection for cross-dressers

Cross-dressers are headed for protected victim status. Cross-wearers, however, are routinely vilified, particularly if the cross is worn in school.

4 posted on 06/22/2005 6:44:36 AM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree (Abortion is to family planning what bankruptcy is to financial planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

5 posted on 06/22/2005 6:49:24 AM PDT by RightWingAtheist (Creationism is not conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree

The comment you made is a reason why exactly why the Democrats are seeing this country, which, by and large is cuturally and religiously conservative, turning more and more RED.

80% of the counties in the U.S. were red in 2004.


6 posted on 06/22/2005 6:50:31 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: deadeyedawg

Was killing Mary Jo a hate crime???


7 posted on 06/22/2005 6:52:39 AM PDT by mortal19440
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RightWingAtheist

Actually, the topic of this thread deals with gays, and the Democrats who are seemingly politically their bedfellows.


8 posted on 06/22/2005 6:53:03 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Just wait 'till this gets filtered down to the plumbing codes. In five years, I'll bet you dollars to donuts that builders are going to have to start installing Men/Women/Other bathrooms for all new construction, along with all the other ADA add-ons.


9 posted on 06/22/2005 6:53:28 AM PDT by gridlock (ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Sen. Gordon Smith (R-OR)

Smith is Republican and Mormon. He's the last person who should be pushing this.

10 posted on 06/22/2005 6:55:22 AM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Teddy is pushing this because he wishes to try out an "alternative lifestyle"?


11 posted on 06/22/2005 6:59:45 AM PDT by NRA1995 (Exactly when did enforcing immigration policy become vigilantism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

True enough!


12 posted on 06/22/2005 7:01:34 AM PDT by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Smith I don't understand pushing this, but Fat Teddy is merely trying to carve out enough 'degeneracy is normal' in order to have his degenerate self defined as normal. Of course, the rest of the nation gets stuffed into the toilet at a downtown bus station and flushed, but what do democrats care if they finally get back into power by destroying the last vestiges of a once great Republic? And they're succeeding beyond even sinkEmperor clinton's dreams for US! We're now embracing even cannibalism and it is Republicans pushing the degeneracy this time!
13 posted on 06/22/2005 7:03:43 AM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Oh, not this s**t again! I loathe Gordon Smith - a RINO if there ever was one. Teaming up with TK. Blechh.

I'll ping the list in a bit, thanks for the alert.


14 posted on 06/22/2005 7:05:21 AM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

I know. I just thought the picture was pretty funny and apropos :-).


15 posted on 06/22/2005 7:06:34 AM PDT by RightWingAtheist (Creationism is not conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Not to worry, the geniuses on the right will just jump in there and get protected status for ex-gays as well. They will then fool themselves into thinking that is some kind of victory.


16 posted on 06/22/2005 7:10:02 AM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRA1995
Teddy is pushing this because he wishes to try out an "alternative lifestyle"?

Maybe he wants to wear a muu-muu to work in the Senate.

They're a lot more comfortable for the full-figured man...

17 posted on 06/22/2005 7:15:51 AM PDT by gridlock (ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Yes, Teddies at it again... and with Smith along to boot.

Smith IS a RINO of the highest order.

I wonder what the Mormon church would do if they found out about this? Smith is supposedly Mormon.


18 posted on 06/22/2005 7:18:45 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RightWingAtheist

The pic was funny.


19 posted on 06/22/2005 7:19:44 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
she-males (individuals who maintian both male and female sex organs for bizarre sex acts)

Uh-huh! Aren't we just a little paranoid?

20 posted on 06/22/2005 7:25:55 AM PDT by ahayes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

If I took treatments to darken my skin, could I claim African-American on the next census form?

There IS no such thing as a sex change operation any more than one can change race. The DNA is unchanged.

It is merely a cosmetic surgery (including sometimes a "castration") by mentally ill members of society who have unstable opinions of self-worth.

There is NO "wear the clothes of the opposite sex" gene. We are born naked. All fashion is cultural.

There can be no more protection from "hate crimes" (refusal of service, violence, insults, termination from work) for cross-dressers than there can be for someone who chooses to wear a tutu, suit of armor, punk rock ripped jeans and mohawk, Donald Duck costume, or profanity labeled shirt.

When will there be hate crimes laws to protect the fat, 4-eyed, pimple faced, braces wearing, brainy nerd in school? Answer, never.

We are all due certain civil rights. The right to not be insulted does not exist. That is free speech. The right to not be hit or beaten exists for everyone and the motive plays no part in sentencing. Employers and businesses are not required to give anyone a job or service.

A person's politics are also not protected by "hate crimes" laws. So in America after President Bush won, you had employers and hotels that discriminated against Republicans.

If Fat Ted, the Swimmer, ever stood up for THEIR rights, I might give a crap.


21 posted on 06/22/2005 8:14:03 AM PDT by weegee (Re: immigration "Those Syrians are coming to Iraq to do the bombings that Iraqis won't do.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

Unisex bathrooms for all. Although there will be special stalls with glory holes for those who like to engage in anonymous same sex encounters in public.

If you think I am taking this too far, The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force has already voiced out seeking to decriminalize cruising for public sex.

Sexual Freedom Activists Target 'Archaic, Unjust' Sex Laws
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1148916/posts


22 posted on 06/22/2005 8:19:56 AM PDT by weegee (Re: immigration "Those Syrians are coming to Iraq to do the bombings that Iraqis won't do.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kjenerette

...weird.


23 posted on 06/22/2005 8:26:15 AM PDT by Van Jenerette (Our Republic...if we can keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: weegee

That's how I see it. Alot of people with more detailed
knowledge of DNA told me I was wrong. There are all
kinds of combos. I think that those combos are nature's
mistakes. We should feel bad for them, not change the
world.


24 posted on 06/22/2005 8:28:08 AM PDT by jusduat (I am a strange and recurring anomaly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jusduat
People who are born hermaphrodites are extremely rare. Generally they are "sex assigned" on the basis of dominant genitalia even if the hormones are different. Mad scientists is what they are.

And how many persons with dual genitalia have both eggs and sperm production and as well as a womb?

Rather than arguing the "freedom" to have sex with whatever you want, they try to claim "scientific proof" that this is normal. It is a soft sell for a deviant agenda just as "safe sex education" in the classrooms got condoms past the door without a discussion of IF kids should even be engaging in intercourse. The homosexual agenda is merely a battering ram to society's laws and mores for the bigger sex positive agenda, which has as its vision seeing everyone sexually active at every age. They see abstinence as wrong, not because it doesn't work, but because it is a "denial" of sexual desires.

I guess that we should all be banging hot looking relatives and friends' married spouses. To not do so would be suppressing these feelings. The Sex Positive proponents don't have a problem with this actually. They want no moral judgments to be made over any pairings.
25 posted on 06/22/2005 8:40:36 AM PDT by weegee (Re: immigration "Those Syrians are coming to Iraq to do the bombings that Iraqis won't do.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: deadeyedawg
"Looks like the Cutty Sark has finally rotted Chappaquiddick Ted's brain."

Methinks Teddy's brain rotted a long -- a very long -- time ago.

What we see now is the effect of rotted brain that has marinated in liberal juices (along with an unhealthy dose of Cutty Sark) for a long period of time.

26 posted on 06/22/2005 9:12:41 AM PDT by chs68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chs68

I always thought it pretty cool that when told to go f*** ones self, that you could actually do it.

Sorry, I am biting my tongue here.


27 posted on 06/22/2005 9:32:44 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Liberal Talking Point - Bush = Hitler ... Republican Talking Point - Let the Liberals Talk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
"I always thought it pretty cool that when told to go f*** ones self, that you could actually do it."

Actually, I would not be able (nor would I want) to accomplish that feat.

Were you perhaps thinking of someone else?

Was it something I said?

28 posted on 06/22/2005 11:56:27 AM PDT by chs68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; I_Love_My_Husband; ...

Homosexual Agenda Ping.

This Senate "hate crimes" folly - or really, worse than folly, could tripe be evil? just won't die. It's like the Undead or something. Ted Kennedy and Gordon Smith - an unlikely twosome, keep pushing it over and over again.

It's really too bad the Republican Party in OR couldn't come up with something better than Smith. A more moderate faux Republican it would be hard to imagine.

I certainly hope it doesn't pass the Senate, and if it does, that the House kills it.

Freepmail me if you want on/off this pinglist.


29 posted on 06/23/2005 12:23:04 AM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

This whole "hate crimes" thing, is all a bunch of $hit, as far as I am concerned.

All part of the big plan.


30 posted on 06/23/2005 3:57:23 PM PDT by Rca2000 (America, oh America, I MISS YOU!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Nowhere Man

Ping


31 posted on 06/23/2005 3:57:45 PM PDT by Rca2000 (America, oh America, I MISS YOU!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Rca2000

The next immediate step after "hate crimes" is "hate speech", since it causes "hate crimes". And the step after that? "Hate thought".

After that? Forced incarceration in mental hospitals or re-education camps, or forced medication.

People may say, "Oh, it can't happen here". Ha.


32 posted on 06/23/2005 4:00:00 PM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Well-- it DID happen in Canada-- the Bible is considered"hate speech" there.

25 years ago, how many people would had said" the government will never try to sanction "gay marriage". I'll bet most of them would have felt things would never come to this. And here we are.

Lenin would had been proud, of how well as his "big plan" is working, here in the U.S.
33 posted on 06/23/2005 5:38:03 PM PDT by Rca2000 (America, oh America, I MISS YOU!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: deadeyedawg
Looks like the Cutty Sark has finally rotted Chappaquiddick Ted's brain.

He HAD a brain?? Who would have guessed???

34 posted on 06/23/2005 5:39:33 PM PDT by texson66 ("Tyranny is yielding to the lust of the governing." - Lord Moulton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rca2000
25 years ago, how many people would had said" the government will never try to sanction "gay marriage". I'll bet most of them would have felt things would never come to this. And here we are.

Tell me about it. I don't know how homosexual marriage came up in history class, I think it was about some guy who advocated it in the 1500's, and a lot of us either laughed or just commented by saying, "how retarded." This was 1979 when we were in 7th grade. There was a time when things like this would get you laughed at if not worse. Think about it, if you went back to 1900 and said that one day abortion would be legal and easy to get, you would have gotten a lot of "never will happens" and/or people will think you're a kook.
35 posted on 06/24/2005 10:17:56 PM PDT by Nowhere Man (Lutheran, Conservative, Neo-Victorian/Edwardian, Michael Savage in '08! - DeCAFTA-nate CAFTA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

Can you just see the US military in five years if this goes through?


36 posted on 06/24/2005 10:21:10 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Shemale? What in the blue hell???

I don't even want to know. Crossdressers and drag queens(aren't they the same damn thing) and ITS(trans) are bad enough.

37 posted on 06/24/2005 10:23:52 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan (Stop the Land Grabs - Markman, Taylor, Young, or Corrigan for SCOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
hate crimes bill that will include federal protection for cross-dressers, drag queens, transsexuals, and she-males

They don't seem to have a problem with flushing the unborn but let's protect these freaks. That means they are trying to force employers to hire these people or else be charged with a "hate crime"?!

There is not a bad idea that Ted Kennedy has not tried to push and usually gets by with it. He seems to be able to find some dumb*ss Republican to join him in most of it.

38 posted on 06/24/2005 10:35:18 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson