Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Caution flag raised on buckyballs; harm to the environment possible
Houston Chronicle ^ | June 23, 2005 | Eric Berger eric.berger@chron.com

Posted on 06/23/2005 1:01:35 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
Grapic with article.


1 posted on 06/23/2005 1:01:37 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Don't know about buckeyballs, but we should be making buildings and bridges out of carbonfiber and not out of steel.


2 posted on 06/23/2005 1:22:37 AM PDT by tahotdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
For those who don't know what the article is talking about, it is about carbon nanotubes in a Helix shape.

I was wondering when the eco-nuts would start demonizing this technology and research.

The eco-nut who wrote this article has an agenda, that agenda is to destory and stop research into technology. In other words, this article is complete BS.

3 posted on 06/23/2005 1:32:29 AM PDT by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tahotdog
They're talking about using buckyballs to build a space elevator.
4 posted on 06/23/2005 1:34:31 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
Something else for the greenies to chew on:

Senate Rejects Greenhouse Gas Limits***The Senate yesterday rejected a measure calling for mandatory limits on emissions linked to global warming, siding with the Bush administration's position that the restrictions would cost jobs, drive industry overseas and run up consumers' energy bills.

Voting 60 to 38, lawmakers rejected an amendment to a major energy bill that would have forced reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases to 2000 levels by 2010 and created an emissions trading program. Eleven Democrats joined Republicans in opposing the measure, and six Republicans voted with the Democrats to support it. Opponents said the legislation would be too costly for businesses and would force manufacturers to move operations and jobs overseas. Some also disputed the conclusions of most scientists who have linked greenhouse gas emissions with global warming.

"My first priority is protecting our families and workers," said Sen. Christopher S. Bond (R-Mo.). The amendment, he added, "will hurt our families, hurt our nation's energy security, drive jobs overseas. I don't want to be imposing this pain when there is no assurance that it will make any significant difference."………..***

5 posted on 06/23/2005 1:35:48 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
A Mitsubishi Corp. subsidiary in Japan already can make 40 tons of buckyballs a year and has plans to expand its capacity to 1,500 tons annually within a few years.

I am FLOORED. I thought they were strictly a micro-scale product.

6 posted on 06/23/2005 1:37:49 AM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

Time marches on.


7 posted on 06/23/2005 1:44:38 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Somewhat off topic, but what is it about the left and naked demonstrators?


8 posted on 06/23/2005 2:25:56 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

I guess it's the only way they'll get covered.


9 posted on 06/23/2005 2:28:57 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
For those who don't know what the article is talking about, it is about carbon nanotubes in a Helix shape.

Uh, no. Although the article briefly mentions nanotubes at one point, it's actually about Buckeyballs, which are another thing entirely. The blurb at the end gives a good quick intro to them.

The eco-nut who wrote this article has an agenda, that agenda is to destory and stop research into technology. In other words, this article is complete BS.

Did you actually read it? You misunderstood what the subject of the article was, and you apparently failed to read the passages where it stated that the known problems have pretty much already been solved...

You complain about the author's supposed "agenda", but you seem to be acting on one more than the article itself does.

So knee-jerking aside, exactly what part of the article is actually "complete BS" -- that is, what parts are you alleging are actually inaccurate in some way?

10 posted on 06/23/2005 2:36:41 AM PDT by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Caution is appropriate, but some nanotech is actually fairly big. They start with molecular level things like bucky balls and go up from there. By starting small they keep it small, but not always nano. The next crop of TVs will be in that category, with nanotubes as the staring point for pixel creation.


11 posted on 06/23/2005 3:03:43 AM PDT by KeyWest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

'nanotechnology', 'nanotubes', 'nanoparticles', 'nanomaterials', 'nanofibers'.....Just think, after all this time, we finally realize Mork was talking about 'Buckyballs'.

Nano nano!


12 posted on 06/23/2005 3:12:12 AM PDT by MagnoliaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Yikes! Kurt Vonnegut's "Ice 9".


13 posted on 06/23/2005 3:20:48 AM PDT by dasboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon

Buckyballs are relatively large so they aren't going to change the chemistry of the water, they would be similar to suspended silt. Also if you've ever lit a wax candle you've breathed in buckyballs.


14 posted on 06/23/2005 3:27:21 AM PDT by palmer (If you see flies at the entrance to the burrow, the ground hog is probably inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The National Science Foundation gave Rice a five-year, $12.4 million grant in 2001...

Time to start shaking the money tree again.

15 posted on 06/23/2005 3:35:38 AM PDT by Fresh Wind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon
But notice how they "bury" that info down in the article, preferring to go with a inflammatory headline.
16 posted on 06/23/2005 3:50:00 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: KeyWest

Just imagine!


17 posted on 06/23/2005 3:52:12 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: palmer
You wrote: "... if you've ever lit a wax candle you've breathed in buckyballs."

Thanks for the info. But I have to add: OH NO, WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!!!!

18 posted on 06/23/2005 3:57:05 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
I was wondering when the eco-nuts would start demonizing this technology and research. The eco-nut who wrote this article has an agenda, that agenda is to destory and stop research into technology. In other words, this article is complete BS.

I'm guessing the engineers at Ga. Tech know more about the water solubility of bucky balls than you do. I'm not sure why you consider them 'eco-nuts' for pointing this out and calling for caution in the consideration of disposal. Batteries are useful, but you don't want to dump them in the river when you're done with them.

19 posted on 06/23/2005 4:00:07 AM PDT by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3

There are a number of ways to write an article, this one was writen in way intending to attack this technology.


20 posted on 06/23/2005 4:03:10 AM PDT by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson