Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: skimbell
One of the problems is that there is no consistency. I know of one area that the local courts have ruled that in order for a government to seize private property the owner needs to be reimbursed to the tune of 3 times FMV. Obviously there's not a hell of a lot of eminent domain there. There just has to be some consistency and regard for personal property rights.

This is a far cry from taking someone's land for the railroad to come through or to build a courthouse. This is taking someone's land and turning it over to a private developer so he can make a profit. It's an outrage.

337 posted on 06/23/2005 10:43:07 AM PDT by GOPJ (Deep Throat(s) -- top level FBI officials playing cub reporters for suckers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: GOPJ
This is a far cry from taking someone's land for the railroad to come through . . . .

Do not forget, that when the railroads first went through, they (the robber barons) and the lumber mills they owned, received one square mile of land on either side of the tracks as far as the tracks ran.

434 posted on 06/23/2005 12:26:05 PM PDT by Bear_Slayer (DOC - 81 MM Mortars, Wpns Co. 2/3 KMCAS 86-89)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies ]

To: GOPJ

I had forgotten about Jesse James, too.


482 posted on 06/23/2005 1:17:22 PM PDT by hocndoc (Choice is the # 1 killer in the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson