Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Taleban commanders 'surrounded'
BBC News ^ | June 23, 2005 | Staff

Posted on 06/23/2005 2:32:23 PM PDT by jeepgal

Taleban commanders 'surrounded'

US and Afghan forces have surrounded at least two senior Taleban commanders in southern Afghanistan after three days of intense fighting, officials say. They say more than 100 Taleban fighters have been killed in one of the biggest offensives in two years.

Hundreds of Afghan troops backed by US-led coalition forces have taken part in the clashes in Zabul province that started on Tuesday.

The Taleban deny having lost any of their men.

On Tuesday, the pilot of a US spy plane was killed when his aircraft crashed while returning to its base in the United Arab Emirates from Afghanistan.

It is not clear whether the plane had been involved in the offensive.

Reports say Afghan and US forces have laid siege to an area in which senior Taleban commanders are believed to be hiding.

They are believed to include Mullah Dadullah and Mullah Brader - both of whom are said to be close to Taleban leader Mullah Omar.

Most of the fighting has taken place in the Daychopan district of Zabul province, near the border with Kandahar.

"We have 103 bodies," Afghan interior ministry spokesman Lutfullah Mashal is quoted as saying by Reuters news agency.

"All of them were armed. Most were killed by coalition helicopter gunships," he said.

A British military spokeswoman, Lt Gemma Fullman, said British planes provided close air support but did not drop any munitions, the AFP news agency reports.

Afghan police commander Gen Salim Khan said eight Afghan security force members had died. The US military said five US soldiers had been wounded.

Taleban spokesman Latifullah Hakimi denied any of the group's fighters had been killed or captured.

Wave of violence

The fighting began after Afghan and coalition forces were attacked by rebels with small arms and rocket-propelled grenades on Tuesday, according to a US military statement.

The forces were patrolling an area south-west of Daychopan, near the border with Kandahar province, when the attack took place.

Tuesday's incident follows a wave of violence earlier this week in which at least 38 rebels were killed in clashes with US-led coalition and Afghan forces in southern Afghanistan.

The BBC's Andrew North in Kabul says doubt has been cast on some of the US military's previous claims about insurgent casualty numbers.

But our correspondent says barely a day goes by now without serious violence across south and east Afghanistan, raising fears for security in September's planned parliamentary elections.

The US has about 18,000 troops in Afghanistan tackling remnants of the Taleban regime that was ousted in late 2001.

Nearly 400 people have been killed in Taleban-linked violence this year, following a lull during the winter - most of them suspected militants, but also about 30 US troops.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; gwot; oef; taliban
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 06/23/2005 2:32:23 PM PDT by jeepgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jeepgal
The Pelosi woman said the war in Afghanistan is over ~ nothing happening.

This report must be false.(/sarcasm)

2 posted on 06/23/2005 2:33:23 PM PDT by muawiyah (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog

Pingerooo!!!!


3 posted on 06/23/2005 2:36:00 PM PDT by b4its2late (If at first you don't succeed, skydiving isn't for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeepgal

Is Sky-hook Omar behind there?


4 posted on 06/23/2005 2:37:54 PM PDT by USAfearsnobody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeepgal

If true, we should just drop a MOAB and be done with it. I don't want to hear about ol' one eye Jack slipping out the back again.


5 posted on 06/23/2005 2:40:37 PM PDT by Dahoser (The UN makes Mos Eisley Spaceport look like a clean room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeepgal
The Taleban deny having lost any of their men.

Who in the Taliban, and FROM WHERE, calls the BBC in real time on this? Please, I really need to know how I can subscribe to the Taliban fax list.
6 posted on 06/23/2005 2:40:58 PM PDT by USAfearsnobody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wiz; Coop; TexKat; Straight Vermonter; Cap Huff

ping!!!!!!


7 posted on 06/23/2005 2:41:27 PM PDT by Deetes (God Bless the Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeepgal

"The BBC's Andrew North in Kabul says doubt has been cast on some of the US military's previous claims about insurgent casualty numbers."

Based on what?? The BBC's need to believe they're not true?? The BBC and its phony reporting that they've been embarrassed and humiliated for in claiming Tony Blair helped cook intelligence on Iraq, hardly makes the BBC a source of credibility or casting doubt on the claims of others.


8 posted on 06/23/2005 2:41:52 PM PDT by MikeA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeepgal

Killing bad guys ~ Bump!


9 posted on 06/23/2005 2:41:55 PM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ros42

ping


10 posted on 06/23/2005 2:42:30 PM PDT by La Enchiladita (Remembering our Heroes today and every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeepgal
"All of them were armed. Most were killed by coalition helicopter gunships," he said.

A British military spokeswoman, Lt Gemma Fullman, said British planes provided close air support but did not drop any munitions, the AFP news agency reports.

Leave it to the BBC to confuse two totally different operations and use one to repudiate the other.

Helicopter gunships do not drop munitions, and airplanes used for close air support are not gunships.

So two different reports are juxtaposed so as to create controversy, when they have nothing to do with each other, and both statements could stand as totally truthfull on their own merit.

By positioning them this way, the BBC hoped to cast doubt on the first statement in order to support the Taliban's claim of not losing any fighters.

11 posted on 06/23/2005 2:43:26 PM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeepgal

Watch that they don't do a deal. No repetitions of Tora Bora.


12 posted on 06/23/2005 2:43:39 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeepgal
Panties and Q'uran-sized toilet pipes at G'itmo waiting for anyone who surrenders!
13 posted on 06/23/2005 2:43:55 PM PDT by DTogo (U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USAfearsnobody

Prolly Baghdad Bob's cousin...


14 posted on 06/23/2005 2:43:56 PM PDT by La Enchiladita (Remembering our Heroes today and every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter; Straight Vermonter

ping


15 posted on 06/23/2005 2:46:27 PM PDT by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Since the war in Afghanistan is over, I say we buy Pelosi a one way ticket to Kabul. I'll start the funding with $1.


16 posted on 06/23/2005 2:47:54 PM PDT by txkev
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jeepgal
When they get these bastards I hope they put them in a room and turn up the G** d***ed air conditioning!!

Sorry to be SO extreme -- but I get emotional about terrorist who try to kill our troops. I'll calm down soon.

17 posted on 06/23/2005 2:49:38 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeepgal

BLU-82!

BLU-82!

Hut!

Hut!


18 posted on 06/23/2005 2:50:24 PM PDT by ryan71 (Speak softly and carry a BIG STICK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txkev

btt


19 posted on 06/23/2005 2:51:09 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I thought it was over, not successful but over, didn't you?


20 posted on 06/23/2005 2:51:55 PM PDT by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson