Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Rescinds Proposed Cut in Federal Support of Public Broadcasting
ap ^ | 6/23/05 | Andrew Taylor

Posted on 06/23/2005 2:53:35 PM PDT by Jean S

WASHINGTON (AP) - Big Bird and National Public Radio won a reprieve Thursday as the House restored $100 million that had been proposed as a budget cut for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

The 284-140 vote demonstrated the enduring political strength of public broadcasting, whose supporters rallied behind popular programs such as "Sesame Street," "Postcards From Buster" and "The NewsHour With Jim Lehrer."

The Public Broadcasting Service undertook a high-profile campaign to rescind the proposed cut. Lawmakers were flooded with letters and phone calls.

The vote came as the House worked on a $142.5 billion spending bill for health, education and labor programs for the budget year beginning Oct. 1.

The Republican-controlled House Appropriations Committee had cut $100 million from $400 million in previously enacted support. The committee also eliminated subsidies for educational programs and technological upgrades.

The corporation was set up by Congress in 1967 to shield public broadcasting from political influence. It distributes federal subsidies to PBS, National Public Radio and hundreds of public radio and television stations.

The corporation's chairman, Kenneth Y. Tomlinson, a GOP appointee, has made news recently with his contention that public broadcasting is too liberal.

Also Thursday, the corporation's board selected Patricia S. Harrison, a former Republican Party co-chairman, as president and chief executive.

Republicans who favored the cuts said federal subsidies provide only about 15 percent of the public broadcasting budget. The rest, they said, comes from private and corporate donors, as well as licensing and royalties from programming.

They said the $100 million cut would amount to only about 4 percent of all spending on public broadcasting.

"Big Bird and his friends can fly on their own," said Rep. Ernest Istook, R-Okla.

PBS still might end up with less money than in its current budget. The legislation would eliminate a $23 million for the Ready to Learn program, which subsidizes children's educational programming and distributes learning materials.

Public broadcasting advocates say $82 million is set to be cut for satellite upgrades and a program to help public TV stations switch to digital technology. Restoring the money would mean dipping into dollars intended for stations and programming, they say.

Opponents of the cut said public broadcasting provides programming not available elsewhere.

"Do we want to live in a society where pop culture dictates all that is offered on the airwaves," said Rep. Nita Lowey, D-N.Y.

---

On the Net:

Public Broadcasting Service: http://www.pbs.org

Corporation for Public Broadcasting: http://www.cpb.org

AP-ES-06-23-05 1737EDT


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: pbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 06/23/2005 2:53:35 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JeanS

Good lord. As if Sesame Street would just go away if not for government funding. The congress is just as bad as W on spending.


2 posted on 06/23/2005 2:55:13 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

wimps


3 posted on 06/23/2005 2:55:49 PM PDT by flashbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Tell me about it. How many voters really consider this a hot-button issue? Those that really care that much can just petition their state governments to pick up the tab. Constitutionally, that's where the issue belongs anyway.
4 posted on 06/23/2005 2:57:15 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

The House is getting to be as bad as the Senate these days. When did Tip O'Neal become Speaker again?


5 posted on 06/23/2005 2:58:57 PM PDT by Kokojmudd (Today's Liberal is Tomorrow's Prospective Flying Saucer Abductee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

would someone please explain to me why I should keep voting for a bunch of spineless wimps?


6 posted on 06/23/2005 2:59:35 PM PDT by snuffy smiff (I sure miss the good old days way back when they used to hang traitors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
So republican government-funded journalism is the only type that Nita Lowey will trust?

I don't understand all the panic and need to defend CPC, using the argument of what a high quality operation they are. I watch The News Hour like everybody else, but what makes them so sacrosanct that they can't accept advertising dollars like every other news outlet. If they're that good and indispensable, plenty of sponsors would be willing to subsidize the operation, and they could probably hire even more people. It seems to me that those on the Left would be leery of a government controlled broadcaster anyway, given their mistrust of this administration. But to me, it's just another example of an enterprise the government shouldn't be involved in.

If I can find it in the Yellow Pages, government shouldn't be doing it.
7 posted on 06/23/2005 2:59:35 PM PDT by MNnice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

What is the point of contolling the house, senate and White House if we can't even cut funding to National Knee Jerk Suck A*s Liberal Radio!


8 posted on 06/23/2005 3:01:29 PM PDT by Stand W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNnice

Love your 'Yellow pages' comment!


9 posted on 06/23/2005 3:02:47 PM PDT by SPOTTEDOWL (Never let the liberals pull you down to their level)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

gutless wonders in Congress at it again.


10 posted on 06/23/2005 3:03:41 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

Of course.


11 posted on 06/23/2005 3:08:54 PM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNnice

12 posted on 06/23/2005 3:09:16 PM PDT by Kokojmudd (Vote out Liberal Republicans! Impeach the Tyrants in Black Robes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kokojmudd

HAH!


13 posted on 06/23/2005 3:13:40 PM PDT by LRS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
They said the $100 million cut would amount to only about 4 percent of all spending on public broadcasting.

Good golly, that's a lot of money then. Wow! What good is it to have a Republican majority if you can't even cut this sort of spending?

14 posted on 06/23/2005 3:19:19 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

The only time Public Broadcasting has quality programming is during fund-raising drives. After they get your money, they put the garbage back on the air.


15 posted on 06/23/2005 3:20:19 PM PDT by Tai_Chung
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

We the people...getting screwed again and again


16 posted on 06/23/2005 3:20:33 PM PDT by joesnuffy (Taglines often reveal a lot about the inner person...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

Offer it again, but specifically target the 'news' division of PBS/NPR.

Its disgusting how the entire face of the cuts was all Big Bird and Dora, and all the edutainment programming that does have value.

Typical MSM trying to pretend like THATS where critics of the network think money is wasted. (which seems to have worked)


17 posted on 06/23/2005 3:21:15 PM PDT by FreedomNeocon (I'm in no Al-Samood for this Sheiite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

Your "Two-Party Cartel" again today shoving it to the conservatives. Again they will robs us of all of our money if you keep electing these fools. The ones that didn't vote for this should be out in the media DEMANDING why our money was taken away. Where is GW??? I forgot, he's out probably getting campaign money or maybe making signs that Islam is a religion of peace or ushering in a few more illegals.


18 posted on 06/23/2005 3:21:49 PM PDT by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

Crap. PBS and NPR need to be kicked off the dole. Sink or swim.

They could have a box on the tax form that anyone who voluntarily wants to support the crap can support it.

Way overdue for another Boston Tea Party.

Gov't spending should be cut 50%.


19 posted on 06/23/2005 3:25:19 PM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snuffy smiff
would someone please explain to me why I should keep voting for a bunch of spineless wimps?

Well, there's...

uh....

Come to think of it, I guess I can't!

20 posted on 06/23/2005 3:26:24 PM PDT by MamaTexan ( TAG!!! You're IT!! :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson