Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nygoose

Taking for private use isn't even mentioned, so apparently it's left up to the states and localities, which is the gist of of the Supreme Court opinion.


255 posted on 06/24/2005 1:44:36 AM PDT by AZLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]


To: AZLiberty

I think the point is that the court allowed a taking for private use. That's what used to be un-constitutional


256 posted on 06/24/2005 2:12:23 AM PDT by nygoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson