Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Terror Strategist Warns of Lengthy Iraqi Insurgency -Withdrawal?
CNSNews ^ | 6/24/05 | Monisha Bansal

Posted on 06/25/2005 8:08:08 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: MizSterious

Yep, its the way Bush's go about things,,,, all things... his pa was no better--- he should of taken saddam out in in gulf war I and we would have this mess behind us; the sooner this incompetent political dynasty passes from the scene the better we off we all shall be...


21 posted on 06/25/2005 8:34:27 AM PDT by aspiring.hillbilly (The Confederate States of America rises again...!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
You gotta go to the source :-)

Anthony H. Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy

Expertise: Middle East military balance, weapons of mass destruction, national missile defense, critical infrastructure protection, homeland defense, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, U.S. and Middle East energy policy, Saudi Arabia

Anthony Cordesman holds the Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy at CSIS. He is also a national security analyst for ABC News. His analysis has been featured prominently during the Gulf War, Desert Fox, the conflict in Kosovo, the fighting in Afghanistan, and the Iraq War.

During his time at CSIS, he has been director of the Gulf Net Assessment Project, the Gulf in Transition Study, and principle investigator of the CSIS Homeland Defense Project. He has led studies on national missile defense, asymmetric warfare and weapons of mass destruction, and critical infrastructure protection. He directed the CSIS Middle East Net Assessment Project and acted as codirector of the CSIS Strategic Energy Initiative.

He is the author of a wide range of studies on U.S. security policy, energy policy, and Middle East policy, which can be downloaded from the Strategic Energy Initiative, Homeland Defense, Military Balance, and Gulf in Transition sections of the CSIS Web site (www.csis.org).

Professor Cordesman has formerly served as national security assistant to Senator John McCain of the Senate Armed Services Committee, as director of intelligence assessment in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, and as civilian assistant to the deputy secretary of defense.

He directed the analysis of the lessons of the October War for the secretary of defense in 1974, coordinating U.S. military, intelligence, and civilian analysis of the conflict, and he has served in numerous other government positions, including in the State Department and on NATO International Staff. He also served as director of policy and planning for resource applications in the Department of Energy, and he has had numerous foreign assignments, including posts in Lebanon, Egypt, and Iran, and worked extensively in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf.

Professor Cordesman is the author of more than 20 books, including a four-volume series on the lessons of modern war. His most recent books include: The Iraq War; Saudi Arabia Enters the 21st Century; The Lessons of Afghanistan; Terrorism, Asymmetric Warfare, and Weapons of Mass Destruction; Cyberthreats, Information Warfare, and Critical Infrastructure Protection; Strategic Threats and National Missile Defenses; and The Lessons and Non-Lessons of the Air and Missile Campaign in Kosovo.

He has been awarded the Department of Defense Distinguished Service medal, is a former adjunct professor of national security studies at Georgetown University, and has twice been a Wilson fellow at the Woodrow Wilson Center for Scholars at the Smithsonian.


22 posted on 06/25/2005 8:41:46 AM PDT by Condor51 (Leftists are moral and intellectual parasites - Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

These pinheads seem to have dug the hole so deep in almost any subject that responses must be either hypocritical or contradictory or both within.


23 posted on 06/25/2005 8:47:32 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection (http://hour9.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse

Thank you for posting that bit from Austin Bay.

I think he's in a better position to judge.


24 posted on 06/25/2005 8:53:38 AM PDT by dixiechick2000 (America needs a FAITH lift.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

Very well said.
Thank you.


25 posted on 06/25/2005 8:54:22 AM PDT by dixiechick2000 (America needs a FAITH lift.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

When does terrorism degrade from a domestic insurgency to mere hate crime?


26 posted on 06/25/2005 8:56:30 AM PDT by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

"Thank you. Haven't James Woolsey and Brent Scowcroft been against the Iraq war all along?"

Yes! We have a winner ... While, this is not a Moore-ish leftwing outfit, they are in the 'realist' camp of not wanting to overthrow baddies like Saddam, because you never know, next might be the Saudi royal family... Scowcroft and Kissinger were tight with Saudis, and this groups views tend to have an "Arabist" flair to them (ie, 'let them have their Arab dictatorships' policy, that Bush has rightly slammed as leading to the current dyfunction in the Arab world).

While Cordesman is pessimistic, you have to grant that it is better not to underestimate the difficulty of the task at hand, and the difficulty has been underestimated.


27 posted on 06/25/2005 8:57:38 AM PDT by WOSG (Liberating Iraq - http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse

Cross linking to the full article.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1430438/posts

It is very good.
Thank you. ;o)


28 posted on 06/25/2005 9:01:41 AM PDT by dixiechick2000 (America needs a FAITH lift.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
If Bush erred at all in this war, it's in the P.R. department. They've allowed so many outright lies to stand, and others have been only weakly countered. They did well during the "shock and awe" phase--they need to keep up the pace. Even Fox, these days, concentrates on all the bad news. The victories over there are scarcely covered.

You are so on target with your statements. The terrorists in Iraq have been confined to the Sunni triangle and are afraid to operate in the south or the north. It is difficult to recall the last carbombing in Basra or up north in the Kurdish area

The President and the administration need to come out swinging on this and show how the leftists and defeatists are carrying water for the terrorists. All while real progress is being overlooked

I think that Karl Roves recent statements were a good start in the right direction

My local news here in Los Angeles (ABC 7) has taken to calling the latest terrorist attacks in Iraq, "Breaking News"

This is even when their are no Americans injured or killed! The defeatists and leftists here in this country are determined force fit Iraq into their vision of Vietnam

I for one do not plan to let them. I will write letters, put up "Support the Troops and the Mission" stickers and whatever it takes to make sure we win this fight

To forfeit this war because good people were too scared to speak up is not an option

29 posted on 06/25/2005 9:10:19 AM PDT by Rooivalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Cordesman has his head up his @$$!!!

30 posted on 06/25/2005 9:12:15 AM PDT by sauropod (Polite political action is about as useful as a miniskirt in a convent -- Claire Wolfe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balch3

Uhhh...maybe because the post Saddam plan wasn't in place. Since there was not one.


31 posted on 06/25/2005 9:12:38 AM PDT by eatdust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000

Thank you, I have a lot of respect for Austin Bay.


32 posted on 06/25/2005 9:18:11 AM PDT by bnelson44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: aspiring.hillbilly
***If we fought WWII like this, the axis would be victorious.***

Think about that for a moment - as in most respects they did win.

Axis Member Italy - They fought a little, surrendered, then we showered them with money and rebuilt their country - No repercussions.

Japan - They raped Asia, systematically murdered Allied POW's, the 'average' Nip soldier made the Waffen SS look like choir boys, the war crime trials were a sham and joke. We dropped two bombs then showered them with money, rebuilt Japan from the ground up and gave them democracy and all our technology . In effect ZERO repercussions.

Germany - Well 'We' did fire bomb the hell out of the place killing million of innocent civilians because of who they voted for. But then we feel bad so after 'they' surrender we shower them with money, rebuild their country too from the ground up, 'gave them' Europe's best economy, and we turned them into the world's biggest pacifists. Except for losing half their country to the commies (thanks FDR you assh*le) and the civilians we killed murdered they did pretty good all things considered.

The BIG winner was the USSR. They gained land and satellite states while the Allies 'lost' their colonies world wide. (sorry Stalin was not an 'ally')

So did the Axis really "loose"?

But you're right, we can't fight a P.C. war and hope to win. In that respect Iraq is Vietnam deja vu with all the "Hearts and Minds" baloney. It wasn't until we learned to fight the VC way and countered with SF MIKE Forces, SEALS, MACV-SOG, Rangers, trained Sniper teams, etc, that things actually started to look favorable and 'even out' tactics wise - that is until the Democrats in Congress and 'Uncle Walter' surrendered.
33 posted on 06/25/2005 9:18:24 AM PDT by Condor51 (Leftists are moral and intellectual parasites - Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44; Racehorse

You're very welcome, but
Racehorse is the one you
should thank.

I have a lot of respect
for AB, too.


34 posted on 06/25/2005 9:21:20 AM PDT by dixiechick2000 (America needs a FAITH lift.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000
It is very good.
Thank you. ;o)

You're quite welcome!

Downtown cranes sprout over city-block-sized construction projects . . . Horst told me that he and his Iraqi counterpart now have tea in a sidewalk cafe along the once-notorious boulevard.

Rather frustrating that this is imagery we never seem to see?  No wonder so many of the troops . . . and us . . . are ticked off at the MSM.

35 posted on 06/25/2005 9:29:53 AM PDT by Racehorse (Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

The biggest sellout was the strident commie sympathizer fdr sending billions of war materials to uncle joe stalin and giving away eastern Europe to the commies.


36 posted on 06/25/2005 9:30:32 AM PDT by aspiring.hillbilly (The Confederate States of America rises again...!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Vice President Dick Cheney, who said the Iraqi insurgency will end "in the months immediately ahead."

Did he really say that? Wow. I hope they're not actually operating as if that's true..

Nah!

It's just one more example of this:
a top terrorism strategist Friday said the president should "stop talking down" to Congress and the American people.

37 posted on 06/25/2005 9:32:51 AM PDT by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Vice President Dick Cheney, who said the Iraqi insurgency will end "in the months immediately ahead."

Did he really say that? Wow. I hope they're not actually operating as if that's true..



I think if things go as planned (i.e. the political process and the training of Iraqi forces), the terrorists in Iraq will no longer be a serious threat to the government of Iraq, and this shift could happen in a matter of 6 months. However, you can bet that there will continue to be fairly regular terrorists attacks in Iraq for many years to come.


38 posted on 06/25/2005 9:33:08 AM PDT by Avenger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
they are in the 'realist' camp of not wanting to overthrow baddies like Saddam, because you never know, next might be the Saudi royal family.

they are in the 'realist' camp of not wanting to overthrow baddies like Saddam, because you never know, next might be the Saudi royal family:

A) whether the devil you know might be preferable to the one you DON'T know,
and
B) just what kind of can of worms you may be opening up!

PS Are you (snort) implying that the people you mention are bigger buddies of the Saudis than the Bushes?

39 posted on 06/25/2005 9:43:14 AM PDT by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: balch3
I thought CNS was a conservative news site.

I believe the key word there is "news".

But you may be one of the many here who prefer to splash around in a baby pool of propaganda.

40 posted on 06/25/2005 9:48:32 AM PDT by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson