Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuclear plant ‘84% complete’-(Iran )
Times Online ^ | June 26, 2005 | na

Posted on 06/25/2005 9:15:36 PM PDT by Flavius

DRIVING along the blasted sands of the Gulf coast, the pristine geometric dome of Iran’s first nuclear reactor rises amid dusty eucalyptus trees, looking for all the world as if it were a Bond villain’s hideout, writes Marie Colvin in Bushehr.

The double barrels of anti-aircraft guns pointing to the sky from their earthwork berms on the road are the first indication that the Bushehr plant is not a film set. The reactor is a focus of fears that Iran is developing nuclear weapons.

Tehran insists the plant will be used only to generate electricity when it goes on line, scheduled for the middle of next year. The West, particularly the Americans, fear Bushehr is the visible tip of a clandestine programme.

Asadollah Saboury, vice-president of Iran’s nuclear plants programme, said the reactor would provide 1,000 megawatts of electricity — enough power for a city of 500,000. Being built by 4,000 Russians and 2,000 Iranians, it was now 84% complete.

The Russians would deliver the reactor’s fuel in the next few months, he said — a deal that President George W Bush tried to stop during his February summit with Vladimir Putin, the Russian president.

A scientist by training, Saboury sought to dismiss worries that the fuel would be diverted or that spent nuclear fuel would be reprocessed into plutonium, one of the paths to building a nuclear weapon.

“The fuel will be sealed in Russia by the International Atomic Energy Agency,” he said. “Here in Bushehr, the IAEA will open the seal and observe the fuel being put in the reactor.”

Without such controls, America has said the waste from Bushehr could be reprocessed to produce enough plutonium for several nuclear bombs a year. Washington’s fears are not unfounded. Iran recently said it had conducted experiments to create plutonium for five years longer than it had previously admitted to.

Saboury’s assurances will go only a small way towards allaying western concerns. A tense stand-off remains — Iran insists it has the right to make nuclear fuel through a second method, the enrichment of uranium.

“This is the plan of our country, to obtain the technology to produce our own fuel,” Saboury said. “We will need it for Bushehr because our contract with the Russians for the supply of fuel runs only 10 years and we intend to construct more than one (nuclear) unit.”

His insistence is far from academic. Two years ago, after a leak from an opposition group, Iran admitted it had been working secretly to enrich uranium with centrifuges at an underground site near Natanz. Such clandestine work is banned under the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty, which Iran signed in 1968.

Washington has said that Iran was working secretly to develop a nuclear bomb; Tehran says it hid the programme because of international sanctions. The fight is central to the dispute, because centrifuge technology to enrich uranium to the low level required for nuclear fuel could readily be shifted to the higher level required for nuclear bombs.

Iran has suspended its enrichment activities while the EU3 — Britain, France and Germany — try to defuse the confrontation through negotiations, set to resume no later than August.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iran; irannukes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

1 posted on 06/25/2005 9:15:36 PM PDT by Flavius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Flavius

I think one well placed J-Dam will solve this whole problem before it begins.


2 posted on 06/25/2005 9:20:39 PM PDT by Andrew LB (Another solder in the fight against liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

US/Israeli bombing plans, also 84% complete! :)


3 posted on 06/25/2005 9:30:20 PM PDT by DTogo (U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

What the heck are we waiting for?

Only force will keep us safe.


4 posted on 06/25/2005 10:42:32 PM PDT by tomahawk (http://tomahawkblog.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat; familyop; BringBackMyHUAC; WestCoastGal; Pepper777; Tuba Guy; SevenofNine; ...

Ping


5 posted on 06/25/2005 11:38:12 PM PDT by nw_arizona_granny (Wake up call: It is time to fight the "Enemy Within".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
Nuclear power is a very good thing for many nations. And that includes for the good people of Persia in the future.
6 posted on 06/25/2005 11:52:23 PM PDT by Red Sea Swimmer (Tisha5765Bav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius; nw_arizona_granny
"The double barrels of anti-aircraft guns pointing to the sky from their earthwork berms on the road are the first indication that the Bushehr plant is not a film set."

Those are also an indication that not much stands in the way of destroying it.
7 posted on 06/25/2005 11:52:57 PM PDT by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk
Do you think that conflicts can be resolved through peaceful means or only by the use of force ?
8 posted on 06/25/2005 11:54:00 PM PDT by Red Sea Swimmer (Tisha5765Bav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DTogo
Do you think that violence is innate or is it a result of conditioning ?

The answer to the question speaks volumes about your possible world-view.

9 posted on 06/25/2005 11:56:00 PM PDT by Red Sea Swimmer (Tisha5765Bav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Sea Swimmer

What a bunch of B.S.!


10 posted on 06/25/2005 11:57:00 PM PDT by Pro-Bush (Can't afford Medical care? Thank an illegal alien.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
"Nuclear plant ‘84% complete’-(Iran )"

I'm betting Isreal won't let it reach 100%.

11 posted on 06/25/2005 11:57:32 PM PDT by blackbart.223 (I live in Northern Nevada. Reid doesn't represent me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pro-Bush

So certain nations can have nuclear power but not Iran, yes ?

Is that what you are saying ?


12 posted on 06/25/2005 11:57:56 PM PDT by Red Sea Swimmer (Tisha5765Bav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blackbart.223
I'm betting that God is watching the world "leaders" very carefully at the moment and is about to intervene !
13 posted on 06/25/2005 11:59:46 PM PDT by Red Sea Swimmer (Tisha5765Bav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Red Sea Swimmer

Correct, Iran cannot be trusted.


14 posted on 06/26/2005 12:00:20 AM PDT by Pro-Bush (Can't afford Medical care? Thank an illegal alien.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Red Sea Swimmer

Another good question might be, "If we destroy the reactor, will that action stop or delay Iran from developing nuclear weapons?" Another yet might be, "Would we be more wise to focus more on staging and developing all levels of our own anti-ballistic missile defense?"


15 posted on 06/26/2005 12:01:30 AM PDT by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pro-Bush
Iran is a nation.

A nation that is made up of millions of people.

Are there are any human beings in that nation who you think may be trusted ?

If I told you that there were indeed trustworthy Iranians would you believe me ?

16 posted on 06/26/2005 12:02:36 AM PDT by Red Sea Swimmer (Tisha5765Bav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Red Sea Swimmer
"So certain nations can have nuclear power but not Iran, yes ?"

Most definitely yes.

17 posted on 06/26/2005 12:03:03 AM PDT by blackbart.223 (I live in Northern Nevada. Reid doesn't represent me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: familyop
Do you read the "Old" Testament ?

Do you know about the Isaiah Option for humankind ?

Some are enamored with high-tech weaponry. I am not one of them.
18 posted on 06/26/2005 12:04:13 AM PDT by Red Sea Swimmer (Tisha5765Bav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: blackbart.223

Do you know any Iranians personally ?


19 posted on 06/26/2005 12:04:59 AM PDT by Red Sea Swimmer (Tisha5765Bav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: blackbart.223
Do you believe in God ?

Are you a Christian fundamentalist who believes in the literal scenario of Armageddon ?

How would you describe your world-view ?

20 posted on 06/26/2005 12:07:00 AM PDT by Red Sea Swimmer (Tisha5765Bav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson