Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alouette
Apparently it is Kogan's version, and not the classical Shulchan Aruch that is being challenged.

Thanks, I'm not really familiar with him. It's still not clear to me whether this is/was an actual investigation of the Shulchan Aruch, his "version", or as some of the articles imply the ongoing investigation into the possibility of criminal charges (dropped Friday) considered against the original 19 legislators and 2 newspapers which printed their charges, in which case some probing into the Shulchan Aruch would be appropriate. In either case, the news is stale.

90 posted on 06/27/2005 4:38:18 PM PDT by SJackson (Israel should know if you push people too hard they will explode in your faces, Abed. palestinian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: SJackson
some of the articles imply

All of the articles have one source: Kogan. "Fake" but "accurate"?

Who stands to gain if (chas veshalom!) Russia bans the "Code of Jewish Law"? Kogan and his "progressives" are the first in line.

92 posted on 06/27/2005 4:44:57 PM PDT by Alouette (The only thing learned from history is that nobody ever learns from history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson