Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Freestar Media: "Lost Liberty Hotel" proposed on Justice Souter's land
Freestar Media ^ | Monday, June 27, 2005 | Logan Darrow Clements

Posted on 06/28/2005 3:40:00 AM PDT by Smile-n-Win

Weare, New Hampshire (PRWEB) Could a hotel be built on the land owned by Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter? A new ruling by the Supreme Court which was supported by Justice Souter himself itself might allow it. A private developer is seeking to use this very law to build a hotel on Souter's land.

Justice Souter's vote in the "Kelo vs. City of New London" decision allows city governments to take land from one private owner and give it to another if the government will generate greater tax revenue or other economic benefits when the land is developed by the new owner.

On Monday June 27, Logan Darrow Clements, faxed a request to Chip Meany the code enforcement officer of the Towne of Weare, New Hampshire seeking to start the application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road. This is the present location of Mr. Souter's home.

Clements, CEO of Freestar Media, LLC, points out that the City of Weare will certainly gain greater tax revenue and economic benefits with a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road than allowing Mr. Souter to own the land.

The proposed development, called "The Lost Liberty Hotel" will feature the "Just Desserts Café" and include a museum, open to the public, featuring a permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. Instead of a Gideon's Bible each guest will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas Shrugged."

Clements indicated that the hotel must be built on this particular piece of land because it is a unique site being the home of someone largely responsible for destroying property rights for all Americans.

"This is not a prank" said Clements, "The Towne of Weare has five people on the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent domain to take this land from Mr. Souter we can begin our hotel development."

Clements' plan is to raise investment capital from wealthy pro-liberty investors and draw up architectural plans. These plans would then be used to raise investment capital for the project. Clements hopes that regular customers of the hotel might include supporters of the Institute For Justice and participants in the Free State Project among others.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: New Hampshire
KEYWORDS: dhpl; dishbestservedcold; eminentdomain; judicialtyranny; justdesserts; kelo; landgrab; lostlibertyhotel; scotus; souter; truejustice; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 541-553 next last
To: SlowBoat407

I think that all street around the hotel should only allow "Left Turns".


181 posted on 06/28/2005 11:47:42 AM PDT by Vortex (Garbage in, Garbage Out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Smile-n-Win
to take land from one private owner and give it to another

Incorrect. BUY land from one owner and SELL to another.

182 posted on 06/28/2005 11:48:36 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Is this satire??


183 posted on 06/28/2005 11:49:10 AM PDT by RockinRight (Conservatism is common sense, liberalism is just senseless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaeWest

More to the point, there's no controlling legal authority. Oh wait, that would be him. :)

The responsible are not responsible.
Those not responsible are responsible, unless anything goes wrong, and then what are you looking at them for? They told you that they weren't responsible. :)


184 posted on 06/28/2005 11:49:48 AM PDT by saveliberty (Liberal= in need of therapy, but would rather ruin lives of those less fortunate to feel good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: CSM

OK, now I have to go to Florida for my psychotherapy. Thanks for the big deflation, dude.

(note: "dude" used as a reference to a gender-non-specific person and shal in no way be mean to infer gender or lack thereof.)


185 posted on 06/28/2005 11:50:18 AM PDT by Fierce Allegiance (This is not your granddaddy's America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Definitely not.


186 posted on 06/28/2005 11:50:42 AM PDT by Fierce Allegiance (This is not your granddaddy's America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: SIDENET

With her head in her a$$ mostly...


187 posted on 06/28/2005 11:50:48 AM PDT by RockinRight (Conservatism is common sense, liberalism is just senseless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Smile-n-Win
Clements' plan is to raise investment capital from wealthy pro-liberty investors and draw up architectural plans.

If he gets the okay, I'll send some bucks to get the project off the ground. Next stop, getting the zoning codes changed in Chappaqua and turning the Clinton compound into a brothel and bulldozing the Kennedy compound into the Atlantic.

188 posted on 06/28/2005 11:50:49 AM PDT by hattend (Alaska....in a time warp all it's own!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CSM
Below is my letter to the Weare Economic Development Commission:

Dear Sirs and Ladies, as appropriate,

I have been made aware of the possibilty of there being a hotel built in Weare, NH. I would like to lend my supoport to the idea of the idea of increasing your towns revenue by saying I would gladly make resevations at such a hotel, at that locale, 34 Cilley Hill Rd. I'm sure in todays new environment of more enlightened use of eminent domain, that it should be no problem to obtian this property for development. So, here's hoping that I can soon be enjoying a stay at the Lost Liberty Hotel in Weare, NH.

Sincerely, Robert Koontz

189 posted on 06/28/2005 11:51:01 AM PDT by RoadGumby (Let your fear be as a monkey, hiding in a pinata)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
"...I like the idea, but before sending money, he needs to set it up right so he is not violating any securities laws. You can't just start collecting money from the public and send people stock certificates....

Your point is well taken, but that is not, from what I understand, what is being proposed. In order to publically list securities for sale, you would be correct, and a prospectus would be required. However, from having set up several Subchapter S, closely-held corporations, I can tell you that there is absolutely no problem with hgaving people contact you to express an interest in, i.e. to express an interest to subscribe to, an eventual offering of stock in a venture. An attorney can fill in the particulars, but what is proposed is to rattle the bushes to see if the requisite financial backing exists- NOT for the immediate SALE... of stock, at this point.

If insufficient serious interest avails, then, much like an IPO that doesn't coalesce, the idea simply stops, and no harm done.

Donations, on the other hand, need to be understood as voluntary monies contributed with no expectation of return other than the political objectives of the donators. These, too, fall outside the purview of the SEC.

There is never a shortage of experts who will tell you why a project cannot be born. Beware of their counsels to inaction, though consider for all their worth to you.

190 posted on 06/28/2005 11:51:35 AM PDT by pickrell (Old dog, new trick...sort of)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Amusement parks...and oil rigs.


191 posted on 06/28/2005 11:52:04 AM PDT by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RoadGumby

This property is right near Everett Lake, and Weare is a very idyllic and pleasant setting - a friend of mine lives up there.


192 posted on 06/28/2005 11:52:32 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: MonroeDNA
I'm in for $100.

You beat me to it! I had the exact same comment in mind.

193 posted on 06/28/2005 11:52:33 AM PDT by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Smile-n-Win
Here's my letter to the Selectmen:

"Most Honorable Selectmen, Ladies and Gentlemen,

By now, I'm sure each of you are aware of the important role you have been given in putting to test the United States Supreme Court's recent decision on eminent domain. I'm equally sure you are aware of an offer to obtain and use a certain property for a more beneficial use.

As has been said thousands of times previously, no event is significant until it happens to be your own ox being gored. I shall need offer no further elaboration upon that matter.

I trust you'll take this opportunity to make those aloof decisions devised at "the hands of that eminent tribunal" a reality to those Justices by helping reveal to them that neither they are ever immune to decisions which erode Constitutional liberties.

May God Bless,

194 posted on 06/28/2005 11:53:40 AM PDT by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smile-n-Win

I heard about this on the radio and had others forwarded me the news article.

Poetic Justice.


I especially love Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged instead of the Gideon Bible. Just Desserts!

LOL!!!!


O/T = Who is Gideon and why did he have so many Bibles?


195 posted on 06/28/2005 11:54:12 AM PDT by Dashing Dasher ( What was the best thing before sliced bread?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dashing Dasher
In answer to your tag line ICE CREAM
196 posted on 06/28/2005 11:55:46 AM PDT by Roccus (The collective has started.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Fierce Allegiance

Don't worry, I'm a dude. A dude that is about to be rich!


197 posted on 06/28/2005 11:55:46 AM PDT by CSM ( If the government has taken your money, it has fulfilled its Social Security promises. (dufekin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

Bookmark


198 posted on 06/28/2005 11:56:40 AM PDT by Velveeta (www.takebackthememorial.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SIDENET
"Anybody know where Ginsburg lives?

Under a bridge?"

YOU'RE GREAT! THANKS.

199 posted on 06/28/2005 11:56:47 AM PDT by alessandrofiaschi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Roccus

The last person who answered said, "Peanut Butter".


Did Ice Cream come before sliced bread?


200 posted on 06/28/2005 11:57:23 AM PDT by Dashing Dasher ( What was the best thing before sliced bread?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 541-553 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson