Posted on 06/30/2005 11:24:54 AM PDT by CHARLITE
What?
This is hardly a surprise, the dems have been covering for their religion of peace for years.
LOL. I thought I had it on semi. Dayam.
It's happened to me before.
yanno... during last night's "30 Days" episode, the Dolt went around asking people "what does a terrorist look like" etc...
At one point, he responded to one of the innumerable "ME/Muslim" responses with "What about Oklahoma City?"
And right then, I knew the guy was a koolaid swilling retard. I would have LOVED to have had that twit ask me THAT question...
Well, I couldn't be too sure and besides, FReepers don't like ALL CAPS posting so I thought maybe if I said it 10 times, it would make an impression.
TXnMA/BobV -- AKA "Grand-dad in the hammock..."
If this is true than the MSM would be all over it, so it must not be.- {sarcasm}
Bump
imo
And what will we owe Clinton and the FBI?
Perhaps you had a slamfire, followed by a run away reload button? ;)
;)
/sarcasm
bttt
Jay-na! Jay-na! Jay-na!
Keep this ball rolling, people. The Third Terrorist is the only book I can ever remember reading that made me mad--I mean INFURIATED.
Please do, Doug, (no sense in both of us bugging her)...
Invite her here. And, please give her my congratulations and best regards. She knows me as "Grand-dad in the hammock..."
Thank'ee kindly!
TXnMA -- AKA "Grand-dad in the hammock..."
Ramzi Yousef (1993 WTC bomber) and Nichols crossed paths in the Phillipines. Khalid Shaikh Mohammed (9/11) was Yousef's uncle. It is interesting to note that Yousef entered the United States on an Iraqi passport and had been known among the New York fundamentalists as "Rashid, the Iraqi". Another name that could be thrown into the mix is Abdul Rahman Yasin (1993 WTC), a U.S. citizen whose family moved to Iraq in the 1960's shortly after he was born and he returned to the U.S. in 1992. After the 1993 WTC bombing, Yasin fled to Iraq and was given monthly salary and housing by Saddam Hussein's regime.
"My own personal view on the cover-up is that Clinton didn't want to deal with global terrorism, or with the growing necessity for dealing with Saddam Hussein."
Yes...and the reason for this is because Clinton came into office with one major priority: Mid-East Peace between Israel and Palestine. That is why even after the first WTC attack in 1993, it wasn't Arabs he went after...but Christians at Waco.
"By 1998, the issue had become so urgent..."
Yep...finally, after the 2 embassy bombings Clinton had to do something. And while he tepidly declared his war on terrorism...it only lasted two weeks, so he could get the peace-talks back on track. Clinton never dealt seriously with these threats because he was afraid such acts would alienate the very Arab support he was seeking in the Israel/Pali conflict.
This has been out there for a few years and nothing has come of it. Louis Freeh was able to get away with "never heard of it" during the 9/11 hearings.
At this point I don't think there is anything there. Why? Just think about the revelation of Iraqi involvement in OKC would do to the Dems and Clinton's legacy.
Does anyone think Miss Davis wouldn't be found dead in Ft Marcy Park if there was something there?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.