Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jveritas

I don't advise voting third party. I generally have supported Bush. But on this issue there must be no compromise. Nominating Gonzalez would instandly destroy Bush's credibility among pro-lifers. This is a fundamental decision. There can be no compromise on judicial appointments.

I'm willing to give Bush the benefit of the doubt, but not on this.


139 posted on 07/01/2005 11:53:25 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]


bump


140 posted on 07/01/2005 12:15:17 PM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero

President Bush is NOT going to nominate a pro-abortion person -- it is not going to happen. Why are you folks to quick to be taken in that he is going to nominate Gonzales when he is already Attorney General and has only been there for a short time?

People are stirring the pot with Gonzales. This is just like in 2000 I wrote a long vanity on why Pres Bush was NOT going to make a pro-abortion person his VP. I was right then and I am right now -- he will not name a pro-abortion person to the SCOTUS. Who was the President who signed the bill immediately to end Partial Birth Abortion when it hit his desk and who is against using fetal stem cells in research? George W. Bush is who and people need to remember his stance in favor of pro-life -- there is no compromise on Supreme Court appointees for this President.


146 posted on 07/01/2005 12:55:06 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- J.C. for OK Governor in '06; Allen/Watts in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson