Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FairOpinion
Actually, I would prefer that Davis were still governor. We wouldn't be in as much debt because Republicans would not have let him borrow so much money. We wouldn't have a Sierra Nevada Conservancy. Davis would be so unpopular that the State would be far more ready to elect a conservative next year.

As it is, we'll either have Arnold for another four years or a Democrat now that the voters are getting sick of Arnold's ineffective duplicity. Either outcome drives the conservative base out of State.

As predicted.

22 posted on 07/02/2005 3:57:06 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (A faith in Justice, none in "fairness.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Carry_Okie; calcowgirl

Carry_Okie: "Actually, I would prefer that Davis were still governor."

====

OK. Here it is, but now I forgot who was the one who kept claiming I lied, when I said that I've seen posts from purportedly conservative posters who actually said on this board, that they preferred a Democrat to Schwarzenegger.

I must save this link, with the proof, for the next time someone will bring it up.


23 posted on 07/02/2005 4:02:28 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Carry_Okie

You're right California Republicans should have voted for McClintock.

I think a lot of success in life is looking at our mistakes and not making them in the future. The idea of electing a 'moderate', does not work for the real goal which is advancing our own ideas.

Also when you already have a guy who you know with certainty is good, stick with him.


30 posted on 07/02/2005 4:13:52 PM PDT by ran15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson