To: Lloyd227
Why not do things in a manner that achieves the goal of removing Souter from his homestead. Apparently his (Logan) goal is only to promote himself and get that television show he wants.
12 posted on
07/02/2005 5:31:08 PM PDT by
politicalwit
(USA...A Nation of Selective Law Enforcement.)
To: politicalwit
"Why not do things in a manner that achieves the goal of removing Souter from his homestead. Apparently his (Logan) goal is only to promote himself and get that television show he wants."
What is your major malfunction? Television show?
Please source your claims. If you have any sources.
21 posted on
07/02/2005 6:42:01 PM PDT by
yooper
(If you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there......)
To: politicalwit
There is nothing to stop someone else from filing another plan on for Mr. Souter's property. That's the beautiful thing about this plan. Mr. Souter can now spend the rest of his days (or until Kelo vs New Longon is overturned) defending every piece of property he owns. If this plan of Mr. Logan's doesn't pass muster, the next plan might, or the one after that. And if Mr. Souter decides to move to the family property in Massachusetts, someone in our midst can simply file the appropriate plans to claim that land and build something more suitable to the economic development of that community as well.
So, if this plan of Logan's is not as well thought out as it should be, then please feel free to file another plan of your own.
The more the merrier until these elite bastards learn that they live under the same laws we do.
Cheers
Lloyd
24 posted on
07/02/2005 6:59:24 PM PDT by
Lloyd227
To: politicalwit
Think about it another way. When the project gets disapproved by the local government, the developer can potentially sue claiming he was denied his rights under the recent Kelo decision. Let that one get to the USSC and we will see some fast revision of justice.
And I liked Steyn's column on the subject using the idea that Federal lands are underutilizing their potential tax revenue and should thus be taken. It could get really interesting.
35 posted on
07/03/2005 5:24:07 AM PDT by
Thebaddog
(Dawgs off the coffee table.)
To: politicalwit
Well, I do have to say that Logan has done far more for "consciousness raising" on property rights and the Foul Five's most recent treason than I noticed in your posts.
Might I ask why the ad hominum attack on him?
47 posted on
07/03/2005 2:09:03 PM PDT by
GladesGuru
("In a society predicated upon liberty, it is essential to examine principles)
To: politicalwit; Freestar
He is a Freeper, and it's bad form not to ping him when you're talking smack about him.
73 posted on
07/04/2005 8:04:39 AM PDT by
Jotmo
("Voon", said the mattress.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson