Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lloyd227

Why not do things in a manner that achieves the goal of removing Souter from his homestead. Apparently his (Logan) goal is only to promote himself and get that television show he wants.


12 posted on 07/02/2005 5:31:08 PM PDT by politicalwit (USA...A Nation of Selective Law Enforcement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: politicalwit
"Why not do things in a manner that achieves the goal of removing Souter from his homestead. Apparently his (Logan) goal is only to promote himself and get that television show he wants."

What is your major malfunction? Television show?

Please source your claims. If you have any sources.

21 posted on 07/02/2005 6:42:01 PM PDT by yooper (If you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: politicalwit
There is nothing to stop someone else from filing another plan on for Mr. Souter's property. That's the beautiful thing about this plan. Mr. Souter can now spend the rest of his days (or until Kelo vs New Longon is overturned) defending every piece of property he owns. If this plan of Mr. Logan's doesn't pass muster, the next plan might, or the one after that. And if Mr. Souter decides to move to the family property in Massachusetts, someone in our midst can simply file the appropriate plans to claim that land and build something more suitable to the economic development of that community as well.

So, if this plan of Logan's is not as well thought out as it should be, then please feel free to file another plan of your own.

The more the merrier until these elite bastards learn that they live under the same laws we do.

Cheers
Lloyd

24 posted on 07/02/2005 6:59:24 PM PDT by Lloyd227
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: politicalwit
Think about it another way. When the project gets disapproved by the local government, the developer can potentially sue claiming he was denied his rights under the recent Kelo decision. Let that one get to the USSC and we will see some fast revision of justice.

And I liked Steyn's column on the subject using the idea that Federal lands are underutilizing their potential tax revenue and should thus be taken. It could get really interesting.

35 posted on 07/03/2005 5:24:07 AM PDT by Thebaddog (Dawgs off the coffee table.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: politicalwit

Well, I do have to say that Logan has done far more for "consciousness raising" on property rights and the Foul Five's most recent treason than I noticed in your posts.

Might I ask why the ad hominum attack on him?


47 posted on 07/03/2005 2:09:03 PM PDT by GladesGuru ("In a society predicated upon liberty, it is essential to examine principles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: politicalwit; Freestar

He is a Freeper, and it's bad form not to ping him when you're talking smack about him.


73 posted on 07/04/2005 8:04:39 AM PDT by Jotmo ("Voon", said the mattress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson