[inquest]

The author failed to explain how Brown is an "activist". To apply that label to someone shoud require explaining, at some point or another, how she actually misrepresented the law.

[Torie]

The focus is on the commerce clause in this article. I don't favor rolling back the commerce clause either. That is one judicial "mistake" if it was, that should not be undone. The nation could not effectively function with a narrow reading.

[Reactionary]

"To apply that label to someone shoud require explaining, at some point or another, how she actually misrepresented the law."

"Activist" appears to mean anyone who doesn't find anything in the Constitution that mentions abortion, gay sex, affirmative action, or the welfare state.

I suppose it means someone who can read, rather than imagine what it is they would have liked to have read.