Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spy at Center of Leak Case Still in Shadow
New York Times ^ | 7/5/5 | SCOTT SHANE

Posted on 07/04/2005 8:51:10 PM PDT by SmithL

WASHINGTON, July 1 - For nearly two years, the investigation into the leak of a covert C.I.A. officer's name has unfolded clamorously in the nation's capital, with partisan brawling on talk shows, prosecutors interviewing President Bush and top White House officials, and the imminent prospect that reporters could go to jail for contempt of court.

But the woman at the center of it all, Valerie E. Wilson, has kept her silence, showing the discipline and discretion that colleagues say made her a good spy. As her husband, Joseph C. Wilson IV, has become a highly visible critic of the administration and promoted his memoirs, Ms. Wilson has ferried their 5-year-old twins to doctors' appointments, looked after their hilltop house in the upscale Palisades neighborhood of Washington and counseled women with postpartum depression.

On June 1, after a year's unpaid leave, Ms. Wilson, now known to the country by her maiden name, Valerie Plame, returned to a new job at the Central Intelligence Agency, determined to get her career back on track, her husband said. Neither the agency nor Mr. Wilson would describe her position, except to make what might seem an obvious point: she will no longer be working under cover, as she did successfully for almost 20 years.

"Before this whole affair, no one would ever have thought of her as an undercover agent," said David Tillotson, a next-door neighbor for seven years who got to know the Wilsons well over back-fence chats, shared dinners and play dates for their grandchildren with the Wilsons' children, Trevor and Samantha.

"She wasn't mysterious," Mr. Tillotson said. "She was sort of a working soccer mom."

He recalled his incredulity on July 14, 2003, when his wife, Victoria, spotted in The Washington Post, in a syndicated column by Robert Novak,...

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bookdeal; bookdeals; cialeak; davetillotson; davidtillotson; joewilson; josephwilson; nigerflap; plame; pseudospy; robertnovak; tillotson; valerieewilson; valerieplame; victoriatillotson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: justshutupandtakeit
I think the sources are CIA (and one possibly at State as Plame had connections there) and I do believe the information was given as an honest explanation, not "retaliation".

Here's an old New York Times column (notice it's not referenced by the very same Times to provide context for this piece) that refers to her status (and makes the State Department connection I just referred to):

Secrets of the Scandal

October 11, 2003

First, the C.I.A. suspected that Aldrich Ames had given Mrs. Wilson's name (along with those of other spies) to the Russians before his espionage arrest in 1994. So her undercover security was undermined at that time, and she was brought back to Washington for safety reasons.

Second, as Mrs. Wilson rose in the agency, she was already in transition away from undercover work to management, and to liaison roles with other intelligence agencies. So this year, even before she was outed, she was moving away from "noc" — which means non-official cover, like pretending to be a business executive. After passing as an energy analyst for Brewster-Jennings & Associates, a C.I.A. front company, she was switching to a new cover as a State Department official, affording her diplomatic protection without having "C.I.A." stamped on her forehead.

~snip~

I don't take everything in the column at face value and some information in it appears conflicting. Novak said her name was readily given and when he said he would publish it, after the first perfunctory "don't" no further urging to withhold the information was given---Novak said his experience is if she had been covert at the time or the knowledge harmful to others he would have been strongly advised not to disclose it and this simply did not happen.

21 posted on 07/05/2005 8:09:46 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

22 posted on 07/05/2005 12:40:19 PM PDT by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal; mewzilla; cyncooper

ping


23 posted on 07/05/2005 12:43:47 PM PDT by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher

That's the picture...thanks!


24 posted on 07/05/2005 1:39:04 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: piasa

Thanks for the ping! I can't get it in the NYT at the moment--usually get in through my library and it's not letting me in right now--does the article say *why* she was put on a year's unpaid leave?


25 posted on 07/05/2005 1:44:40 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

Pinging you to my question in #25, regarding something you mention in #11.


26 posted on 07/05/2005 1:57:56 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
Over at The Corner (scroll down) they have a new picture with this description:

According to Vanity Fair, the photo was taken at the magazine's annual dinner for the Tribeca Film Festival, and Plame's and Wilson's fellow guests included Robert deNiro, Nicole Kidman, Barry Diller, Willem Dafoe, John McEnroe, and many others. Plame's and Wilson's photo appears below a shot of David Bowie and Sean "P. Diddy" Combs.

The Corner is commenting on the Times slurpfest:


27 posted on 07/05/2005 2:08:03 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

It does not say why.

It's interesting because if she were the victim of retaliation you'd think the CIA would have put her on paid leave if they felt she needed to be absent from the agency during the course of the investigation...


28 posted on 07/05/2005 2:10:20 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper; piasa; Shermy
Thanks. Here's one reason I was wondering--from the (in)famous Vanity Fair article:

In 1997, Plame moved back to the Washington area, partly because (as was recently reported in The New York Times) the C.I.A. suspected that her name may have been on a list given to the Russians by the double agent Aldrich Ames in 1994.

If part of the reason for her recall to Washington was that the Agency was concerned Ames had compromised her, it stands to reason they were no longer using her for undercover work after that. It also may raise other questions if she was put on unpaid leave as well.

29 posted on 07/05/2005 2:18:41 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
# 22.......Thanks for the pic, spycatcher.

Yuk, Valerie could use some shoulder pads if she wants to be half a power couple. She looks like a sock puppet.

Well, I guess if you want to move up in DC liberal society circles, you can't be too rich or too thin.

Leni

30 posted on 07/05/2005 3:58:13 PM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson