Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Steve_Seattle
These were not jury nullification per se, but came close to it. I think jury nullification is one step away from anarchy.

Jury nullification was intended by the Founders as a powerful weapon against a tyranical government. Even many Americans today believe that *law* is whatever the government SAYS it is......nothing could be further from the truth.

In this fashion William Penn (who gave his name to Pennsylvania) was acquitted by a jury in London in 1670 when prosecuted for preaching Quakerism. The Salem witch trials ended in 1693 after 52 consecutive jury acquittals. Similarly, John Peter Zenger was acquitted by a jury in 1735 in New York when prosecuted for criticizing the mayor. The Fugitive Slave Acts were effectively nullified by juries in the 1850s. Similarly, juries effectively put an end to Prohibition during the 1920s.

Here's an informative web page on JURY NULLIFICATION

34 posted on 07/06/2005 7:47:40 AM PDT by MamaTexan (I am NOT a *legal entity*...nor am I a ~person~ as created by law!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: MamaTexan

My opinion is, if as a potential juror you think a law is unjust and you can't enforce it in good conscience, you should recuse yourself from the jury.


37 posted on 07/06/2005 7:53:48 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson