Replies

Following your logic, if children (11-17) are naked in their backyard with other naked children present, it is acceptable. and... if parents agree it is acceptable behavior, then it is.
Naked sunbathing to me seems odd in itself. What possible benefits come from naked sunbathing other than no tan lines?And why should children (11-17) be concerned about tan lines?
What's still hanging out here unanswered is, why do you suppose God clothed his (married) creation?

31 posted on 07/06/2005 9:22:45 AM PDT by The Brush

What's still hanging out here unanswered is, why do you suppose God clothed his (married) creation?

Why do you suppose the Old Testament has any bearing on our legal code? Aren't there some pork eaters out there you could be hassling instead?

32 posted on 07/06/2005 9:26:37 AM PDT by AdamSelene235 (Truth has become so rare and precious she is always attended to by a bodyguard of lies.)

Following your logic, if children (11-17) are naked in their backyard with other naked children present, it is acceptable. and... if parents agree it is acceptable behavior, then it is.

If all the parents involved agree and the kids are okay with it AND there is no hanky-panky going on, what's the problem?

Naked sunbathing to me seems odd in itself. What possible benefits come from naked sunbathing other than no tan lines?

Some people like to enjoy the sun and the fresh air unclothed. It's a personal preference, like enjoying vanilla ice cream over chocolate.

What's still hanging out here unanswered is, why do you suppose God clothed his (married) creation?

I don't believe the Judeo-Christian creation myth. However, nudity is not appropriate in every (or most) circumstances.

37 posted on 07/06/2005 9:34:41 AM PDT by Modernman ("Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made." -Bismarck)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794