You are very, very mistaken. Why do they build water turbines at the bottom of thousand-foot dams? If a generator were no harder to turn as the electrical load went up, why wouldn't the dribble from a downspout suffice to light up NYC?
Conservation of energy, one of the most fundamental axioms of physics, is at stake.
Cut the attitude, you don't know what you're talking about.
had a physics teacher who had a series of regular bulb lights wired onto a generator powered by an exercise bicycle.
One light was not hard. Two lights required more pedaling.
and so on until five lights were lit and it was like going up a steep hill.
It demonstrates load and resistance very very very well.
"You are very, very mistaken. Why do they build water turbines at the bottom of thousand-foot dams? "
Because water has to be falling in order to convert he kinetic energy into electric energy. The more energy the water has through the height of the column of water above it, the larger the turbine you can turn to generate electricity. It has nothing to do with electrical loads. You can have zero load on the turbine and it is limited by the kinetic energy in the flow of the water. If you put an infinite electrical load on the turbine, it doesn't stop turning. You also need a constant supply of flowing water, which you are not assured of if you put your turbines at the top of a dam.