Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Schiavo Autopsy Results: Terri Dailies July 6
Accuracy in Media-Media Monitor ^ | July 6, 2005 | Cliff Kincaid

Posted on 07/06/2005 10:50:06 AM PDT by 8mmMauser

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 1,721-1,732 next last
To: Houmatt
You don't like that? Too bad. I didn't ask for your opinion anyway.

Another voice of maturity heard from.

81 posted on 07/06/2005 2:00:17 PM PDT by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: highball
Until you can show me just where in the Constitution it says there is a right to die (which is the issue here, not what you think the Constitution says or does not say), maybe you should sit down and shut up.

Michael and co. did not have a right to kill Terri. Period. End of discussion.

82 posted on 07/06/2005 2:00:38 PM PDT by Houmatt (Where can I get a T-shirt with Karla Homolka and a superimposed bullseye on it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: texasbluebell
"What always gets me is that so many otherwise intelligent people can't understand the difference between "brain-damaged" and "brain-dead"."

What frightens me is that some may actually know the difference and it still doesn't matter.

83 posted on 07/06/2005 2:00:48 PM PDT by Earthdweller (US descendant of French Protestants_"Where there is life, there is hope"..Terri Schindler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer

The truth hurts that bad?


84 posted on 07/06/2005 2:01:13 PM PDT by Houmatt (Where can I get a T-shirt with Karla Homolka and a superimposed bullseye on it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
1. Not the truth.

2. Doesn't hurt.

85 posted on 07/06/2005 2:02:14 PM PDT by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
Well, then, since you seem to know more about what the Constitution says than I do, would you be willing to make that same argument, to, say, Ann Coulter?

Yes, as a matter of fact I would have no problem carrying on this discussion with the stick lady. Although I do tire of Republican mantras.

Maybe it's because you are just talking out of your ass, reading things into a document that do not exist, much like the so-called "right to privacy" and "separation of church and state."

??!?! Didn't mention right to privacy or separation of church and state as neither are addressed in the Constitution. What is addressed in the Constitution and the intent (as evidenced by Madison's statement in #45) is the power and purview of the separate and sovereign states. Trying to change the subject?

Are you even a conservative? Because you sure as hell are not acting like one.

No, I'm not a Republican. Big difference

86 posted on 07/06/2005 2:05:42 PM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
Michael and co. did not have a right to kill Terri.

The court ruled that it was Terri's wish not to remain alive under those circumstances. This ruling was upheld at every level of the state and federal judiciary. The question is about the right of people to refuse medical treatment, not about a 'right to kill'.

87 posted on 07/06/2005 2:06:41 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
Until you can show me just where in the Constitution it says there is a right to die (which is the issue here, not what you think the Constitution says or does not say), maybe you should sit down and shut up.

Michael and co. did not have a right to kill Terri. Period. End of discussion.

Rudeness does you and your position little credit, sir.

I have already proven that the Constitution does not exhaustively list all of our rights. Allow me to prove it once again:

Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Her husband had a legal right to treat her PVS in a manner consistent with established medical practice. He did that. Nobody is seriously suggesting that he did something illegal in his choice of treatment. Not even the most virulent Michael-hater. "Period. End of discussion."

88 posted on 07/06/2005 2:09:35 PM PDT by highball ("I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." -- Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: highball

Terri's fight isn't over yet.


89 posted on 07/06/2005 2:21:01 PM PDT by freepertoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: freepertoo

?

What do you mean?

And what does that have to do with the legal rights of the husband under our laws, and the fact that the Constitution is emphatically not a list of rights?

Did you mean to address your comment to me?


90 posted on 07/06/2005 2:25:23 PM PDT by highball ("I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." -- Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller

Scary thought. That hadn't crossed my mind.


91 posted on 07/06/2005 2:28:16 PM PDT by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: texasbluebell
I read the book. I don't want to ruin it for you but if you really want to know what I gleaned from it, I'll tell ya. Tee Hee..
92 posted on 07/06/2005 2:30:30 PM PDT by Earthdweller (US descendant of French Protestants_"Where there is life, there is hope"..Terri Schindler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller

It won't ruin the book for me. Go ahead.

If someone else reading this doesn't want to know, just don't read Earthdweller's comment!


93 posted on 07/06/2005 2:33:53 PM PDT by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer
The date for completion for the book might not have been up to Mark Fuhrman. I have seen numerous book contracts and each one listed a specific a due date for the final manuscript, although in certain cases extensions have been made by publishers.
94 posted on 07/06/2005 2:36:10 PM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: billbears

Interesting perspective? Three g-g-g grandfathers who fought for the Confederacy fought for Freedom????? Taught the Confederacy tried to withdraw from the United states to maintain Slavery, Freedom to keep Slaves!! but then there goes logic again.......


95 posted on 07/06/2005 2:37:35 PM PDT by True Republican Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: texasbluebell
Well there are some intriguing new revelations in the book about the circumstances leading to Terri's collapse. The amazing part is what Fuhrman does with the information most of us already know about the case.

He is painstakingly methodical in his evaluation of the available evidence and bends over backwards to be objective. He tries to avoid making a judgment about whether it was right for Terri to be let go in the end and focuses on her life before and at the time of her collapse.

There is definitely something here for everyone no matter where you stood on Terri's death.

The overall impression I got of Micheal was that he was a lazy opportunist that thought the world owed him something. I guess that doesn't make him a murderer..just a low life.

Terri reminds me of a lot of over weight high school girls who are social outcasts. So sweet and so naive. It is so sad that Micheal was the first one she ever dated.

It seems she just could not see who he really was until right before the end.

96 posted on 07/06/2005 2:46:28 PM PDT by Earthdweller (US descendant of French Protestants_"Where there is life, there is hope"..Terri Schindler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: billbears

"No, I'm not a Republican. Big difference"

Thank GOD! Thats the Best News from You all day.
Excellent News for the Republican party.


97 posted on 07/06/2005 2:46:34 PM PDT by True Republican Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: billbears
The Sheriff and his men implemented an illegal order. If the same had been done in war it would be a war crime. That they were "just following orders" does not protect them.

Would I swear a complaint for murder and conspiracy to murder against the whole lot -- sure! Why do I not? I have not the resources to go to Florida and do so.

Should people do so? Yes.

It might be like some Polish Jew swearing a warrant against the Nazis in Occupied Poland, but I hope not.

98 posted on 07/06/2005 2:50:07 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: bvw
It might be like some Polish Jew swearing a warrant against the Nazis in Occupied Poland, but I hope not.

Well, no, it's not, but thanks for that exciting look into your fantasy world.

99 posted on 07/06/2005 3:05:41 PM PDT by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller

That's great to hear how MF evaluated the facts. This is what was missing all along, a dispassionate look at the facts of the case.

Yes, what a shame that TS was so naive and had so little experience. She really didn't stand a chance, it seems. Her family also seems to be incredibly good-natured and kind-hearted, in spite of what they went through.

Thanks for the report, I'll definitely be buying a copy.


100 posted on 07/06/2005 3:05:56 PM PDT by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 1,721-1,732 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson