Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freepatriot32
"Cooper added. ''I think this clearly points out the need for some kind of a national shield law. There is no federal shield law and that is why we find ourselves here today.''"

Rubbish. You need to go to jail for aiding and abetting the felon who leaked confidential national security secrets, not be "shielded" from jail because someone pays you to type on a keyboard (i.e. "journalism").

27 posted on 07/06/2005 2:59:01 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Southack

snif..snif..i'm verklempt.


28 posted on 07/06/2005 2:59:52 PM PDT by samadams2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Southack
Rubbish. You need to go to jail for aiding and abetting the felon who leaked confidential national security secrets, not be "shielded" from jail because someone pays you to type on a keyboard (i.e. "journalism").

You're absolutely right. First, there is no right to this in law. Other privileges (priest, doctor) are very narrow and come from British common law. Second, there is a very good argument that journalists have no right to confidential sources at all. If nobody goes on the record, then what are you doing printing it? Third, and most importantly, journalists should not be given a shield because they are no better than the rest of us. I'm a journalist here on FR and I should not be entitled to any special benefits.

60 posted on 07/06/2005 8:39:25 PM PDT by AmishDude (Once you go black hat, you never go back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson