[ohioWfan]

I'm not defending the Saudis..........just deliniating the differences between the countries where we have intervened militarily, and those we have not.

Your first cryptic post to me implied that you thought that we should invade Saudi Arabia militarily and kill the terrorists there.

I'm just making the distinction between the necessity of invading Afghanistan and Iraq, and your implication that we should do the same in Saudi Arabia.

Neither of us knows what kinds of pressures are being put on the Saudi government by the Bush administration behind the scenes to go after the Imams and shut down the rhetoric.

btw.....I wouldn't be surprised if there were Saudis involved in any terrorist attack...........but that's not the point, IMO.

[null and void]

Your first cryptic post to me implied that you thought that we should invade Saudi Arabia militarily and kill the terrorists there.

And the problem with this is?

[af_vet_rr]

Your first cryptic post to me implied that you thought that we should invade Saudi Arabia militarily and kill the terrorists there.

Your right, I didn't mean to give that impression. The only thing we can do in regards to SA, is to get off middle eastern oil and completly pull out of the region, and that still may leave us vulnerable.