[Our_Man_In_Gough_Island]

No, you didn't say those things specifically, but you were in the midst of a group of posters with similar sentiments, and all three of those comments were made. If you don't like being characterized by those statements, pray take more care to distinguish your own ideas from them.

There is a word for waging war on a group of people solely on the basis of their religious identification - genocide. I am glad to hear you do not endorse that approach by literal name, but it is hard to see how, in substantive fact, " getting serious" about waging war on people who accept the Koran could in reality be anything else.

[tet68]

but it is hard to see how, in substantive fact, " getting serious" about waging war on people who accept the Koran could in reality be anything else.

Some call it survival, personally I think the destruction
of Medina would be a start, a warning if you will.

An instructive lesson, we have the power, and we will use it
on that which declares war on us, continue and Mecca is
on the way to destruction, no chance make your time.

You see, the terrorist Islamic fanatics, have no problem
with group guilt or they would target our leaders.
If enough Muslims are punished they WILL deal with the guilty.

Now you can bleat about "rational behavour" etc, but we
are dealing with rabid dogs AND THEIR OWNERS!