Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fido969; cyncooper
Rove and Cooper spoke once before the Novak column was available, but the interview did not involve the Iraq controversy, according to a person close to the investigation who declined to be identified to be able to share more details about the case.

Could be chaff, but Cooper's two articles discussed more than Iraq.

In an interview with The Washington Post on Wednesday, Luskin denied that Cooper had received a call from Rove releasing him from his confidentiality pledge. Yesterday, however, Luskin declined to comment on a New York Times report that the release came as a result of negotiations involving Rove's and Cooper's attorneys, nor would he speculate that Cooper was released from his pledge in some other fashion than a direct conversation with Rove. "I'm not going to comment any further," Luskin said.

Very shifty. Cooper expressly stated he talked with his "source." It was not lawyers. Luskin shouldn't comment further seeing how his every word is twisted.

"I didn't know her name, and I didn't leak her name."

Begs the question, "Yes, but did you say "wife."" Seemed all of Washington was.

2 posted on 07/08/2005 1:28:06 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Shermy

Nobody in the WH knew that Joe Wilson went to Niger until his op-ed. Once that was revealed, they still would not be privy to his wife's role.

So, no...parsing out the name vs. "his wife" still doesn't get a WH official as the source.


7 posted on 07/08/2005 2:12:25 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson