No, I am not happy.
In 4 I said: "[Michael Schiavo murdered [Terri Schiavo], with assistance of the legal profession, last March."
In 10 I said: "when one spouse abuses the marriage, for example, through adultery, grounds for divorce exist", and then "Micheal's guardianship should have been declared null and void as soon as his adultery became known".
In 20 I clarify what grounds for divorce exist: "adultery, abandonment, physical abuse".
I don't know how else to explain myself to you.
Michael Schiavo is guilty of adultery and abandonment of his wife and therefore was not a lawful guardian. Justice demanded that his guardianshipp were terminated and passed over to Terri's parents, or (theoretically) the state. I agree that a law that allows for divorce initiated on behalf of a spouse who is not able to communicate and suffered adutery, abandonment or abuse, is a good idea. I do not think that a law that allows for divorce merely on a disagreement regarding medical care is a good idea.
Please tell me if I have not made myself clear. I have honestly tried.